Benderloch said::roll:Zedebee said:Wow, that’s a beautiful car but a lot of money. Interestly Autotrader rated it as a “fair” price.![]()
I think that refers to the weather when the photos were taken![]()
Benderloch said::roll:Zedebee said:Wow, that’s a beautiful car but a lot of money. Interestly Autotrader rated it as a “fair” price.![]()
I think that refers to the weather when the photos were taken![]()
Just been looking at Aston Martins ( yes might be upgrading) and the add showed 92 photos and not one under the bonnet or close up of the wheels :roll:gIzzE said:Seriously? 73 photos.
Talk about over doing it.
Zedebee said:Wow, that’s a beautiful car but a lot of money. Interestly Autotrader rated it as a “fair” price.
JamieZ4C said:
24057 said:JamieZ4C said:
One owner and an 09 plate aside it’s still expensive. If it was a better spec I could maybe see £12k maybe £12.5k As it stands £10k ish seems fair, generic low spec interior lets it down imo
Edit: wait, it’s now listed as ‘4’ owners not ‘1’![]()
Mr Tidy said:While it was a 56 plate on 76K, my MC was advertised for less last December.![]()
Zedebee said:Mr Tidy wrote: ↑Wed Dec 02, 2020 9:07 pm
While it was a 56 plate on 76K, my MC was advertised for less last December.
That seems a bargain
Zedebee said:Ooo-err, I’m in for an Inspection 2 tomorrow.
JamieZ4C said:
Tacky car, tacky price.JamieZ4C said:
C4Dman said:Noob Z4 owner here.
But having looked at the advert and notice it is described as mint condition, and yet checking out latest mot means it will require two new front tyres very soon, not to mention a set of rear pads. Seems ambitious, but as they become rarer good examples will attract a higher price, just because good examples are hard too find.