So what do you think of the new M2?

I have to say I was never a massive fan of the 1M. I was astounded by its depreciation performance in the market. If you read between the lines it was criticised for a lot of the same things the Z4MC was (harsh ride and unruly over poorly made up roads) yet the critics fawned over it. It was produced in similar volumes, had very similar performance. Just goes to show the power of hype (longest staged reveal of a car by a manufacturer apart from Jag with the F Type) and the media. No wonder the car journos get all of those freebies and jollies.
 
original guvnor said:
I have to say I was never a massive fan of the 1M. I was astounded by its depreciation performance in the market. If you read between the lines it was criticised for a lot of the same things the Z4MC was (harsh ride and unruly over poorly made up roads) yet the critics fawned over it. It was produced in similar volumes, had very similar performance. Just goes to show the power of hype (longest staged reveal of a car by a manufacturer apart from Jag with the F Type) and the media. No wonder the car journos get all of those freebies and jollies.

totally agree and the engines just aren't what they used to be tbh.....

but hopefully they aren't a fragile either.... i love my s54 and i don't think bmw will better it in S-6 form anyway but theirs always the nag something costly is around the corner! its worth it however... I'm starting to get TVR mentality.
 
I quite like it, primarily because its size is more ideal for being a city m car, it's a shrunken m4 which is cool as the m4 is just a little too long wide for city living.

From a handlin perspective the shorter wheelbase will probably make it more 'agile' which equates to more fun to the oversteery crew, as the 235i has already shown.

As with the auto industry trend it is designed and costed to fill a void, it will be a fit for someone out there, there's nothing like variation, and drives more brand marketing until the new z4m.

Not everything is about performance, surely 0-62 in 4.5 is fast enough, but 7.58 round the ring is a bit slow, but that's not the point, it's obviously going to be a barrel of fun and as with the m4 will be someone's bargain after 3 yrs, maybe even me :)
 
bluestreak56 said:
I know im going to get spat on here but I just dont see the need for the M cars, whats the point of 367bhp or 0-60 in 4.5 seconds? Am I the only one who drives around the UK, cant get past 30mph, cant accelerate at a set of lights as the next set is 250 yards down the line. You cant go over 70 anyway, the roads are full of 1 litre fiestas that do 0-60 in 11 seconds and it costs a bomb!

As a track car or for racing fine go ahead its only money and the atmosphere at the end of the day. As a car to drive in reality, I say no to all M's.

Rant over.

Having said the above, I think there is a place for the styling, but people will probably just call me a pony car driver..

But you can take that view with most things in life.
Why have a 3 bed house when you could 'manage' with a flat.
Why have steak for dinner when a sandwich would do?
Why wear a Rolex when a cheapo tells the time just the same?
You get my point.
 
Not a eureka moment at all. I knew coming into ownership it was overpowered but you couldnt get the coupe in less than the 3l so ...

It was the same with my old E24 635Csi - yes I could have tried to find a 628i but I wanted one of the last cars and they are few and far between so again..

I avoid driving in central london like the plague, but I cant be the only person who finds traffic everywhere they go. Yes I do live inside the M25 but surely all these A roads have commuters on them more than 60% of the time.

Being a petrol head doesnt have to all be about power? I dont think everyone on here is like Jeremy Clarkson. There are other factors.

I get that if you want to feel the power you can get up at 5am on a Saturday or find a particular quiet road somewhere to race, but to me I dont get why your own vehicle would be for that? I would doubt that would be its use more than 5/10% of the year? Having said that I have the same though process about the Roadsters....

But thats just me! Anyway, back to the topic. I dont like the look of the 2 series either.
 
Carol M said:
bluestreak56 said:
I know im going to get spat on here but I just dont see the need for the M cars, whats the point of 367bhp or 0-60 in 4.5 seconds? Am I the only one who drives around the UK, cant get past 30mph, cant accelerate at a set of lights as the next set is 250 yards down the line. You cant go over 70 anyway, the roads are full of 1 litre fiestas that do 0-60 in 11 seconds and it costs a bomb!

As a track car or for racing fine go ahead its only money and the atmosphere at the end of the day. As a car to drive in reality, I say no to all M's.

Rant over.

Having said the above, I think there is a place for the styling, but people will probably just call me a pony car driver..

But you can take that view with most things in life.
Why have a 3 bed house when you could 'manage' with a flat.
Why have steak for dinner when a sandwich would do?
Why wear a Rolex when a cheapo tells the time just the same?
You get my point.

I get your point but those things are not excessive (except perhaps the Rolex, which I agree with). I do think some people just go for excess in life.
 
A 3 litre coupe sportscar is also excessive....
Doesn't get you anywhere faster in traffic.
Buy a 1.0 fiesta.
 
Personally, I'm not sure if I like the styling or not and I'll reserve opinion until I've seen one in the flesh (metal?)

On the subject of size, I think it's just about perfect - because of the inflationary tendencies in BMW's range, give or take a few mm, the current 3/4 series cars are the same size as my old E39 5-series whereas the current 1/2 series are the same size as my old E36 3-series so, IMO, and ignoring the styling aspects, they're more like a descendent of the classic M3s than the current M3/4 models are
 
original guvnor said:
Officially launched at 11pm last night, although there was an early leak of an Auto Express article.

http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-news/new-cars/2016-bmw-m2-revealed-365bhp-exclusive-studio-pictures

I reckon it's good value for money. Certainly a lot more so than the 35iS is undiscounted.

I'd spend 28k on a second hand m235 and 400 quid on a 377 bhp remap
 
Think it looks pretty nice, not 100% on the seats but the rest of it...

Now how hard would it be to put the drivetrain into the Z4 :)
 
Why oh why don't they make a new z4m... i bet they do in the new generation, must be due in the next 1-2 years. Z4 with a mix of M4 + M2 + M4 GTS parts... i'd be going to test drive it.
 
jimmybell said:
i bet they do in the new generation,
First of all hope that there will be a new z4 generation. The sales are very bad.
The marketing attention that the z4 got (mostly gt3 racing) did not result in special models (z4m or otherwise :headbang: )
 
i like the look of the m2, also like the idea of a st fiesta! (faster than a 1.0)

this would appeal to me as i like the overall size of the car. i always liked the 1coupe and feel a 3 is a bit big. but if its juts a bit of a let down M3 then why not buy a couple of yr old m3 thats just lost a bit of cash and is a better car.

what i dont get is the smoking tyre launch control. so launch control was created to stop smoking tyres and get the perfect launch but then people get bored as there is not wheel spin so they computer generate it such that there is wheel spin...... whats wrong with just mashing the throttle and dumping the clutch? lol
 
GuidoK said:
jimmybell said:
i bet they do in the new generation,
First of all hope that there will be a new z4 generation. The sales are very bad.
The marketing attention that the z4 got (mostly gt3 racing) did not result in special models (z4m or otherwise :headbang: )

Z4 sales are bad? It's probably the second most common BMW i see on the roads?

Sales maybe bad this year because... its a ridiculously old model over-refreshed and not replaced.
 
Sales have been low for a while (years). In fact I believe that overall sales have been bad too, little over half of the previous generation or so.

Especially US sales are extremely low compared to the e85 generation. And that's bad as the US cars are usually the higher specced cars with bigger engines and more options, so these are more profitable to sell as margins are much higher on those.
 
Sales have been really, REALLY bad. That's why there isn't even a sniff of a new model. It's been out the same length of time now as the E85 too. You see spy photos of a new model at least 18 months before it launches and we've seen nothing about a new Z4.
 
I doubt they will drop the 2 seater convertible altogether...

I think overall the Z3 and Z4 has been good for Bmw..
Maybe a Z5 ...?
 
I think it looks significantly better than the M235i, more muscular, I bet it will be a lot of fun.

Interestingly isn't it about the same weight as the Z4M coupe but with a lot more torque. Haven't you M guys discussed where you go from the Z4M isn't this a natural successor, just a shame it's coupe only
 
Back
Top Bottom