Who are you kidding fella - you're never gonna sell your beloved coupe :wink:Taz said:for me its the worry of reselling a car with over 100k on the clock, we all know cars are easy good for 100k but there still is the problem of reselling
Who are you kidding fella - you're never gonna sell your beloved coupe :wink:Taz said:for me its the worry of reselling a car with over 100k on the clock, we all know cars are easy good for 100k but there still is the problem of reselling
Marlon said:Who are you kidding fella - you're never gonna sell your beloved coupe :wink:Taz said:for me its the worry of reselling a car with over 100k on the clock, we all know cars are easy good for 100k but there still is the problem of reselling
Thermaltake said:I dont understand the obsession with mileage.
Maybe having always driving old jap cars ive always discarded mileage as a consideration for purchase. I remember buying my mk1 mx5 and I didnt even know the mileage, Im sure i glanced at it in the advert but then had to actually check when i viewed the car when i got there as I had forgotten. Turns out it was 133,000 which was a mix of KM and Miles due to being an import. Still didnt care. Just made sure the sills werent rusty. Checked everything as you would normally on a car etc.j
Its seems certain marquees and forums have varying degrees of boners over mileage, Ive seen loads of comments on peoples for sale threads whinging about mileage, "i would only pay that if it was -xxxx miles less" etc. It seems pretty prevalent around here, Do people genuinely believe cars mysteriously fall apart when they hit 100,000 miles? that buying a car with 50,000 miles means they want have any issues?
If anything the higher mileage cars will already have had replaced the stuff that wears with mileage, Brake lines, Suspension bushes etc. Buying a low mileage car without these done just means you will probably have to pay for it at some point on top of increased price for buying the "low miles" car, Then all you have left as a bonus for a low mileage car is you also get to put "low miles" in your for sale advert.
Sure lower mileage car is preferable but in terms of choosing a car to buy i wouldnt even put in top 3 of my considerations.
I also dont see how the coupe is a mileage sensitive. Its a pretty bombproof engine, No reports of chassis rust etc. No known common serious issues (i.e K series headgaskets, clio 197 gearboxes etc). Things wear and tear as per normal but I would say the coupe was the opposite of mileage sensitive.
Thermaltake said:I dont understand the obsession with mileage.
Maybe having always driving old jap cars ive always discarded mileage as a consideration for purchase. I remember buying my mk1 mx5 and I didnt even know the mileage, Im sure i glanced at it in the advert but then had to actually check when i viewed the car when i got there as I had forgotten. Turns out it was 133,000 which was a mix of KM and Miles due to being an import. Still didnt care. Just made sure the sills werent rusty. Checked everything as you would normally on a car etc.
Its seems certain marquees and forums have varying degrees of boners over mileage, Ive seen loads of comments on peoples for sale threads whinging about mileage, "i would only pay that if it was -xxxx miles less" etc. It seems pretty prevalent around here, Do people genuinely believe cars mysteriously fall apart when they hit 100,000 miles? that buying a car with 50,000 miles means they want have any issues?
If anything the higher mileage cars will already have had replaced the stuff that wears with mileage, Brake lines, Suspension bushes etc. Buying a low mileage car without these done just means you will probably have to pay for it at some point on top of increased price for buying the "low miles" car, Then all you have left as a bonus for a low mileage car is you also get to put "low miles" in your for sale advert.
Sure lower mileage car is preferable but in terms of choosing a car to buy i wouldnt even put in top 3 of my considerations.
I also dont see how the coupe is a mileage sensitive. Its a pretty bombproof engine, No reports of chassis rust etc. No known common serious issues (i.e K series headgaskets, clio 197 gearboxes etc). Things wear and tear as per normal but I would say the coupe was the opposite of mileage sensitive.
Maybe not, but you may well be in a minority! :lol:Rialas said:mr wilks said:If you want a manual coupe, than for me, it would have to be the Z4MC (they don't cost much more than the 3.0). Not sure how you come to that conclusion (and "then" may well be the right word in place of "than"!
Which makes the 3.0si coupe more desirable as an auto than a manual imo
"Well not IMO! It isn't some sort of diesel barge! "
And I really doubt I'm the only one with this opinion.

How did you guess.Mr Tidy said:Just wondering, but is your non-M Coupe one of those rare (unloved) autos by any chance.......![]()
Rialas said:How did you guess.Mr Tidy said:Just wondering, but is your non-M Coupe one of those rare (unloved) autos by any chance.......![]()
![]()
Ok.... Here's another reason for the nonbelievers.
Those buying the coupe are in their 40-50's. Mainly. The younger lads/girls aren't interested in older cars because there's such a huge selection of hip new hot hatches, small engines, nippy, easier to insure and kitted out with all the latest "i" gear.
Therefore 40-50's = old knees = auto.
Trust me. :lol:
Good for you. Enjoy.Tcochrane92 said:Rialas said:How did you guess.Mr Tidy said:Just wondering, but is your non-M Coupe one of those rare (unloved) autos by any chance.......![]()
![]()
Ok.... Here's another reason for the nonbelievers.
Those buying the coupe are in their 40-50's. Mainly. The younger lads/girls aren't interested in older cars because there's such a huge selection of hip new hot hatches, small engines, nippy, easier to insure and kitted out with all the latest "i" gear.
Therefore 40-50's = old knees = auto.
Trust me. :lol:
I'm 24 and I'm looking at getting an auto coupethe flappy paddles do it for me
I definitely will miss the fun of heel-toeing though
Tcochrane92 said:Rialas said:How did you guess.Mr Tidy said:Just wondering, but is your non-M Coupe one of those rare (unloved) autos by any chance.......![]()
![]()
Ok.... Here's another reason for the nonbelievers.
Those buying the coupe are in their 40-50's. Mainly. The younger lads/girls aren't interested in older cars because there's such a huge selection of hip new hot hatches, small engines, nippy, easier to insure and kitted out with all the latest "i" gear.
Therefore 40-50's = old knees = auto.
Trust me. :lol:
I'm 24 and I'm looking at getting an auto coupethe flappy paddles do it for me
I definitely will miss the fun of heel-toeing though

Rialas said:How did you guess.![]()
Ok.... Here's another reason for the nonbelievers.
Those buying the coupe are in their 40-50's. Mainly. The younger lads/girls aren't interested in older cars because there's such a huge selection of hip new hot hatches, small engines, nippy, easier to insure and kitted out with all the latest "i" gear.
Therefore 40-50's = old knees = auto.
Trust me. :lol:

Mr Tidy. I wasn't clear. I mean't those in their forties and fifties. Of which I'm in the same decade as you.Mr Tidy said:Rialas said:How did you guess.![]()
Ok.... Here's another reason for the nonbelievers.
Those buying the coupe are in their 40-50's. Mainly. The younger lads/girls aren't interested in older cars because there's such a huge selection of hip new hot hatches, small engines, nippy, easier to insure and kitted out with all the latest "i" gear.
Therefore 40-50's = old knees = auto.
Trust me. :lol:
OK, that is fair enough (mind you I'm 50-60 so older knees than yours). :lol:
But if nothing else it does mean there may be a Z4 for me when I enter my next decade (which isn't too many years away)!
Mind you I'll still have to get in and out of the car - maybe then an E85 will be in order so I can lower the roof before I try to get in!![]()
I'm with all the way on this. Not only more desirable, but rarer as well.Rialas said:Which makes the 3.0si coupe more desirable as an auto than a manual imo. And I really doubt I'm the only one with this opinion.
Rialas said:Therefore 40-50's = old knees = auto.
Trust me. :lol:

gerryp said:Rob s said:Looks like a good example. exhaust tips and the carbon engine cover point to an enthusiast owner at some point.
I`ve seen the different coloured engine covers and wasn`t sure if it was a cosmetic thing or something different in the engine spec.
And on Jamies car when the dealer says `must sell this weekend`which weekend does he mean as the ad has been saying this for quite a while.
Were you at Gaydon last August ?Taz said:having an auto coupe and an M roadster i can say the coupe is far nicer to drive
Taz said:[post]1370077[/post] having an auto coupe and an M roadster i can say the coupe is far nicer to drive
...............COUPE - THE BEST LOOKIN Z4 BY FARSENIOR MEMBER OF THE EXCLUSIVE COUPE CLUB...............NOT FOR HAIRDRESSERS

NickDE said:Were you at Gaydon last August ?Taz said:having an auto coupe and an M roadster i can say the coupe is far nicer to drive
Taz said:NickDE said:Were you at Gaydon last August ?Taz said:having an auto coupe and an M roadster i can say the coupe is far nicer to drive
No I've never been there