Would you change your vote ?

[Darkangelv2]

If he'd said 'Stupid Right Honourable Woman' would it still be considered misogynistic?

 

[TitanTim]

I think he said stupid people although no lip reader.

https://youtu.be/1edfyaJ4YrA

So he's called everyone in the house stupid

Isn't that worse

Tim.

 

[mr.tourette]

I think he said stupid people although no lip reader.

https://youtu.be/1edfyaJ4YrA

So he's called everyone in the house stupid

Isn't that worse

Tim.

tbf though it was factually correct

 

[Buckley06]

If he'd said 'Stupid Right Honourable Woman' would it still be considered misogynistic?

so true

 

[Nictrix]

What should he have said, stupid person?
If he had said woman, what is wrong with that, she is a woman........... I think

 

[exdos]

Political correctness has been the weapon of choice of the Left. Yesterday, Corbyn was holding the weapon by the blade and injured himself. Ha! Ha! Bloody Ha!

 

[Vornwend]

Brexit nailed....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wFG-h_SFagQ

 

[Jembo]

I can see rioting & curfews ahead https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-politics-47652071

Better start stocking up on food

 

[ben g]

I can see rioting & curfews ahead https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-politics-47652071

Better start stocking up on food

The problem is it will need more than 17.4million (I think 'leave' was that figure) signatures to counteract the initial vote :lol:

If it does manage to achieve that, then fair play. If not, I see no reason why we should remain.

 

[MrPT]

The problem is it will need more than 17.4million (I think 'leave' was that figure) signatures to counteract the initial vote :lol:

 

[ben g]

The problem is it will need more than 17.4million (I think 'leave' was that figure) signatures to counteract the initial vote :lol:

toilet-urinel.jpg

:lol:

 

[Jembo]

The problem is it will need more than 17.4million (I think 'leave' was that figure) signatures to counteract the initial vote :lol:

toilet-urinel.jpg

:lol:

Confirmation email took 9 hours to arrive yesterday, in that time about another 700k of votes were cast, so current total’s quite a way behind

 

[Flyingfifer]

I do find it interesting that bringing the same deal over and over is democratic but asking the people twice isnt :scratchhead:

 

[Jembo]

I do find it interesting that bringing the same deal over and over is democratic but asking the people twice isnt :scratchhead:

When the goons in Westminster after almost 3 years are incapable of agreeing even a pissup in a brewery, has to be put back to the people.

When you ask for something, you normally have s plan... at the moment that plan is just leave & believe everything will be ok.

I think you need to look at history to see just how many fekups have occurred trusting in people on this basis

 

[Smartbear]

I do find it interesting that bringing the same deal over and over is democratic but asking the people twice isnt :scratchhead:

When the goons in Westminster after almost 3 years are incapable of agreeing even a pissup in a brewery, has to be put back to the people.

When you ask for something, you normally have s plan... at the moment that plan is just leave & believe everything will be ok.

I think you need to look at history to see just how many fekups have occurred trusting in people on this basis

That would just be making a mockery of democracy, I’m sure Westminster will work it out eventually.
Rob

 

[andyf1140]

I do find it interesting that bringing the same deal over and over is democratic but asking the people twice isnt :scratchhead:

That's exactly what the speaker ruled against, unless the plan contains material differences it cannot be put to a 3rd vote

 

[PerryGunn]

If I was cynical, I'd say that the root of the problem is that many MPs don't want to leave Europe before they've had a chance to get their snouts in the EU money trough - you only have to to look at people like Peter Mandelson and the Kinnock family to see how lucrative becoming part of the EU establishment can be...

 

[Flyingfifer]

I do find it interesting that bringing the same deal over and over is democratic but asking the people twice isnt :scratchhead:

When the goons in Westminster after almost 3 years are incapable of agreeing even a pissup in a brewery, has to be put back to the people.

When you ask for something, you normally have s plan... at the moment that plan is just leave & believe everything will be ok.

I think you need to look at history to see just how many fekups have occurred trusting in people on this basis

My point exactly.

That's exactly what the speaker ruled against, unless the plan contains material differences it cannot be put to a 3rd vote

The speaker didnt actually make a ruling it was only technically a statement to the house.

A 2nd ref would also have material differences, primarily a far better understanding in people of the real world ramifications of a vote to leave.

 

[Smartbear]

I do find it interesting that bringing the same deal over and over is democratic but asking the people twice isnt :scratchhead:

When the goons in Westminster after almost 3 years are incapable of agreeing even a pissup in a brewery, has to be put back to the people.

When you ask for something, you normally have s plan... at the moment that plan is just leave & believe everything will be ok.

I think you need to look at history to see just how many fekups have occurred trusting in people on this basis

My point exactly.

That's exactly what the speaker ruled against, unless the plan contains material differences it cannot be put to a 3rd vote

The speaker didnt actually make a ruling it was only technically a statement to the house.

A 2nd ref would also have material differences, primarily a far better understanding in people of the real world ramifications of a vote to leave.

Would we be be repeatedly given the chance to vote again until they got the original verdict reversed?
What happens if leave wins again, best of 3? :?
Rob

 

[Jembo]

When the goons in Westminster after almost 3 years are incapable of agreeing even a pissup in a brewery, has to be put back to the people.

When you ask for something, you normally have s plan... at the moment that plan is just leave & believe everything will be ok.

I think you need to look at history to see just how many fekups have occurred trusting in people on this basis

My point exactly.

That's exactly what the speaker ruled against, unless the plan contains material differences it cannot be put to a 3rd vote

The speaker didnt actually make a ruling it was only technically a statement to the house.

A 2nd ref would also have material differences, primarily a far better understanding in people of the real world ramifications of a vote to leave.

Would we be be repeatedly given the chance to vote again until they got the original verdict reversed?
What happens if leave wins again, best of 3? :?
Rob

That’s not the point Rob.

Given Westminster can’t agree & considering everyone’s now more informed the people must tell them what to do
- Go for no deal
- Accept May’s deal on basis of next 60 days
- Remain

... where no deal/Mays option votes are added together & where more than remain go for highest of 2 leave options

That’s people democracy