bigdog said:It's not the kids fault. I really mean that. I really feel very strongly that it is first and foremost the parents fault. I look to history for the answer. While there has always been a certain level of crime. It really started to take an uptick amongst the younger folks about the same time as the anti-establishment types came to the fore in the 60's. No mater what one thinks of the new found freedom the ladies found starting in the 60's. The hard facts are that the ladies were instrumental in instilling moral character to the kids. When both parents sought to have a career along with kids. It was the kids upbringing that suffered the most. Kids are now spending more time with strangers at daycare or the telly than with their birth parents. Of course the parents feel guilty and shower the kids with "things". Rather than their time.
Then there is the government. They (the government) just can't pass up a good opportunity to indoctrinate a new class of dependent minions. So they pass laws that one can't raise their voice to their kids. One can't give a firm swat or hand slap to redirect the kids attention away from misbehaving without fear of going to jail. Kids are much smarter than we give them credit for. They learn that their actions will have very few consequences. And even if they do. So what. They know that the government will just write a check so they can "get by".
Now before the ladies gang up on me. I have no issues what so ever with "women's lib" in general. I just think that if one chooses a career. They should think long and hard about not bringing kids into this world. Then hand them over to hired help. I think at least one parent should be at home to raise the life they created. Whether it's the wife or the husband is for each couple to decide. These aren't pets. They are humans that we create and their upbringing is a serious matter.
OK fire away. As bigdog puts on his Nomex suit.
bigdog said:It's not the kids fault. I really mean that. I really feel very strongly that it is first and foremost the parents fault. I look to history for the answer. While there has always been a certain level of crime. It really started to take an uptick amongst the younger folks about the same time as the anti-establishment types came to the fore in the 60's. No mater what one thinks of the new found freedom the ladies found starting in the 60's. The hard facts are that the ladies were instrumental in instilling moral character to the kids. When both parents sought to have a career along with kids. It was the kids upbringing that suffered the most. Kids are now spending more time with strangers at daycare or the telly than with their birth parents. Of course the parents feel guilty and shower the kids with "things". Rather than their time.
Then there is the government. They (the government) just can't pass up a good opportunity to indoctrinate a new class of dependent minions. So they pass laws that one can't raise their voice to their kids. One can't give a firm swat or hand slap to redirect the kids attention away from misbehaving without fear of going to jail. Kids are much smarter than we give them credit for. They learn that their actions will have very few consequences. And even if they do. So what. They know that the government will just write a check so they can "get by".
Now before the ladies gang up on me. I have no issues what so ever with "women's lib" in general. I just think that if one chooses a career. They should think long and hard about not bringing kids into this world. Then hand them over to hired help. I think at least one parent should be at home to raise the life they created. Whether it's the wife or the husband is for each couple to decide. These aren't pets. They are humans that we create and their upbringing is a serious matter.
OK fire away. As bigdog puts on his Nomex suit.
bigdog said:It's not the kids fault. I really mean that. I really feel very strongly that it is first and foremost the parents fault. I look to history for the answer. While there has always been a certain level of crime. It really started to take an uptick amongst the younger folks about the same time as the anti-establishment types came to the fore in the 60's. No mater what one thinks of the new found freedom the ladies found starting in the 60's. The hard facts are that the ladies were instrumental in instilling moral character to the kids. When both parents sought to have a career along with kids. It was the kids upbringing that suffered the most. Kids are now spending more time with strangers at daycare or the telly than with their birth parents. Of course the parents feel guilty and shower the kids with "things". Rather than their time.
Then there is the government. They (the government) just can't pass up a good opportunity to indoctrinate a new class of dependent minions. So they pass laws that one can't raise their voice to their kids. One can't give a firm swat or hand slap to redirect the kids attention away from misbehaving without fear of going to jail. Kids are much smarter than we give them credit for. They learn that their actions will have very few consequences. And even if they do. So what. They know that the government will just write a check so they can "get by".
Now before the ladies gang up on me. I have no issues what so ever with "women's lib" in general. I just think that if one chooses a career. They should think long and hard about not bringing kids into this world. Then hand them over to hired help. I think at least one parent should be at home to raise the life they created. Whether it's the wife or the husband is for each couple to decide. These aren't pets. They are humans that we create and their upbringing is a serious matter.
OK fire away. As bigdog puts on his Nomex suit.
Stuart Truman said:To Ruby's comment, with no youth clubs and frequently both parents having to work to make ends meet they get no guidance. It's no excuse for this type of behaviour but it doesn't help.
Bing said:pvr said:So ... birthing baths are out then?![]()
Perhaps birching baths ? I am sure a birch branch on wet skin will sting a lot - nice hot water to get that skin sensitivity up ?
Nosa said:No matter how you have been brought up, inside you know whats wrong and what is right.
If someones dad is a robber and then monkey see monkey do, are we going to lock the dad up for the crimes committed by the child.
Bing said:So. I get what Ruby is saying. But Nosa is also right in that instinct tells you what is right or wrong, no matter what your background, unless you truly are wired up wrong in the head as a small majority are.
quote]
Precisely what I mean though, having had traumatic exposures as a young person - for no fault of their own, can have a significant impact on "wiring".
micz4 said:Tom won't be fathering Ruby's children by the sound of it![]()
RubyBlueZ4MC said:micz4 said:Tom won't be fathering Ruby's children by the sound of it![]()
Well since I am a "career" woman I ought not to have any according to Bigdog.
Carol M said:No fear of parents, teachers, police or adults in general breeds this behaviour.
Nosa said:Carol M said:No fear of parents, teachers, police or adults in general breeds this behaviour.
Only point of your statement I disagree with sweetums, I would say "No Respect for teachers, police or adults in general breeds this behaviour."
