Nictrix said:I work in a school and can say from my side of it that our superiors do not have a clue what to do or how to organise it.
Up until 1pm on Friday, although I knew the schools were closing that day, I didnt know what I was to do come Monday morning.
At 1pm on Friday I was told that my school was on the list of schools that would stay open for vulnerable kids and kids of frontline workers.
They have no idea how many kids will be coming to the school and I imagine they may only know the numbers on Monday getting ready for the influx on Tuesday.
As council employees we are pretty much all classed as frontline workers and have to turn up for work as normal on Monday morning. The only difference is that if the school you normally worked in is closed you must go to the nearest high school and then be told what you are doing that day.
Basically herding people from different areas into the one building with people you dont normally get in contact with.
I have a difficult decision to make as my wife has asthma (she has been pretty much working from home for most of last year with the project she is working on) I am slightly worried about bringing the virus home to her. I do not want to stop working as I feel its like giving in, I have not been off work since October 2009, I dont stay off work.
Where other departments in the council were asking their workers if they had any health issues that meant they should self isolate or work from home, we were not asked as they cannot afford for any of us to stay at home, we have been short staffed for years.
We at the lower end do not count.
ronk said:I fear this is only the beginning.
It’s ok for Boris and his merry men to preach calm and restraint but I will lay Lincoln odds that they aren’t in a queue for their weekly grocery shop!
Chris_D said:Some more promising news from Dr. Berg
[youtube]9CF_W0XX_Kw[/youtube]
john-e89 said:ronk said:I fear this is only the beginning.
It’s ok for Boris and his merry men to preach calm and restraint but I will lay Lincoln odds that they aren’t in a queue for their weekly grocery shop!
No but what is he supposed to say Ronk..? Oh yep fine you lot carry on and kill each other panicking and being nasty to others trying their level best to help you..? If he went to a supermarket he’d get linched by knuckle draggers who just constantly want someone to blame no matter how ridiculous. It’s all very well folk criticising all the time but you show me someone who has all the correct answers right away.
john-e89 said:ronk said:I fear this is only the beginning.
It’s ok for Boris and his merry men to preach calm and restraint but I will lay Lincoln odds that they aren’t in a queue for their weekly grocery shop!
No but what is he supposed to say Ronk..? Oh yep fine you lot carry on and kill each other panicking and being nasty to others trying their level best to help you..? If he went to a supermarket he’d get linched by knuckle draggers who just constantly want someone to blame no matter how ridiculous. It’s all very well folk criticising all the time but you show me someone who has all the correct answers right away.
Tinker15 said:mr.tourette said:Unfortunately we are in deep s**t now, our Government hasn't taken this seriously enough from the start, if we had put tougher measures in earlier we could have contained this much better as shown in South Korea, im truly appalled at our Government's handling of this, there is going to be a lot of deaths that could have been prevented if we had took the action we are taking now 3 weeks ago
The government has been following advice given by Sir Patrick John Thompson Vallance FRS FMedSci FRCP and Professor Christopher John MacRae Whitty CB FRCP FFPH FMedSci. It’s always interesting reading the views of armchair critics but I prefer to listen to those who are suitably qualified.
ronk said:john-e89 said:ronk said:I fear this is only the beginning.
It’s ok for Boris and his merry men to preach calm and restraint but I will lay Lincoln odds that they aren’t in a queue for their weekly grocery shop!
No but what is he supposed to say Ronk..? Oh yep fine you lot carry on and kill each other panicking and being nasty to others trying their level best to help you..? If he went to a supermarket he’d get linched by knuckle draggers who just constantly want someone to blame no matter how ridiculous. It’s all very well folk criticising all the time but you show me someone who has all the correct answers right away.
Self preservation / survival is a basic instinct and while I fully agree that Boris et al couldn’t go to Tesco there should be better provisions (no pun intended) for those he has rightly asked to lock down - I priority for home delivery ? It’s 10 or 12 days for me. I can’t ask anyone to get my shop and look like they are hoarders.

Nictrix said:should the post and deliveries be put on hold for a while as surely this is an ideal way to spread something from one end of the country to the other.
M1k3yC said:Nictrix said:should the post and deliveries be put on hold for a while as surely this is an ideal way to spread something from one end of the country to the other.
I think that is unlikely unless the delivery driver is sick and coughs all over the recipients of packages. To be clear, I am not qualified to make any statements about what is or isn't a risk, but if you refer to the following page you'll see: "Staff should continue to follow existing risk assessments and safe systems of working; there are no additional precautions needed for handling post or packages."
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-to-employers-and-businesses-about-covid-19/guidance-for-employers-and-businesses-on-coronavirus-covid-19#handling-post-or-packages
To be safe, don't lick your post! :wink:
Chris_D said:One of the links to a study in my post above suggests that Covid19 could survive on certain materials for a length of time. So yes, in principle it could reasonably be supposed that this could be a transmittal method.
M1k3yC said:Chris_D said:One of the links to a study in my post above suggests that Covid19 could survive on certain materials for a length of time. So yes, in principle it could reasonably be supposed that this could be a transmittal method.
A question about receiving post was asked on BBC breakfast and they had qualified professionals in the studio. The answer was that post is safe.
Technically, I think you're right about it surviving on certain materials and that did come up. However, the point made by the person delivering the answer was that this was under ideal conditions and you do not eat your post. So, if you want to be extra careful, wash your hands after handling packages and even don't handle a package (e.g. to unbox an item) from an unknown source for a day or two. I didn't really want to debate the theoretical possibilities (see my previous comment about not being qualified), but I also don't want people worrying too much about the tiny theoretical risks. I can see from speaking to my own parents that the unknown and "what ifs" are making people stressed.![]()
Chris_D said:Personally, I prefer to err on the side of caution rather than take unecessary risks. 3 months in IC with respiratory illness is not something I want to go through again.
:wink: