D
Deleted member 32480
Guest
Pondrew said:Actually a car drove down our road today. It stopped about 50 yards away so I couldn't see the badge and I didn't recognise it. It looked like a Maserati from the back, had quad exhausts and was a really shiny red. When it came back out I saw it from a window and saw it was a KIA, but couldn't read the model. So I looked it up. It was a KIA Stinger! 3.3L turbo 365bhp, looks absolutely stunning.
I had never heard of them.
Guy on my road has one.
From a distance they look good but you must remember you would be buying a car that was ~35k new in todays money? Which is roughly the same price as a SI back in 2008? (without taking into account any inflation).
In my opinion all those little things (touches of quality and brilliance) that add up on cars to make it better than the sum of it's parts just aren't there on a Stinger.
Jump in one, then jump in a slightly older BMW or a Merc that's the same price and you will know what I am trying to say.
365bhp straight 6 (unfortunately with a turbo) sounds great but when you think about most modern hatches will pee all over those figures these days... and that's without factoring that she weighs 2.2 tons!
Knowing how tight you are Pondrew (no offence) I think you are better off taking a gamble on something like an e93 m3 that ticks all your box's (flashy, 4 seats, v8) knowing that you aren't going to lose any (or very little) on the depreciation side or a F12 or even the e64 M6 (all weigh less that a stinger and have more power?) plus all have engines you would go to bed dreaming about.
Put aside the money you would lose in depreciation on a Stinger over two years to fix the M should anything go wrong, buy with a full service history and pray nothing goes wrong. Expect to lose a little as the market corrects it's self but be pleased you have bought a car that is excellent (if you bought the hard top version) and is at the bottom of the depreciation cycle.