john-e89 said:That's just your opinion, doesnt make it right, and not sure how helping people is tyranny....quite the opposite in fact. A !ow risk is still a risk and as RD said it's not as though there are hospitals with all the staff and equipment needed to look after them down the road. Sometimes folk need saving from themselves.
You're assuming that everyone effected by this is happy and willing to have their government by punishment of force or penalty restrict their lives almost completely, they are not permitted to leave their properties, they cant even go for a walk ffs.
Take the logic of your argument that risk should be avoided, the gov should stop everyone driving, moving, eating what they want, sex, swimming, cycling, travelling, smoking, drinking.... the list goes on. Life IS risk. You cannot live without risk its basically impossible. The problem here is that tyrannical governments have decided that they are the arbiters of what is and isn't acceptable risk in peoples lives, its oppressive government plain and simple.
Do you think the Chinese government is tyrannical? Or the North Korean government? They are just protecting their citizens from what they classify as risk after all. They are just saving them from themselves after all.
Mindboggling


:wink: