original guvnor said:Doesn't really bother me, as someone else says, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery and all that.
But....an M car is a car fettled by M-Division. Brakes, suspension, engine, interior, styling, everything really. To put an M badge on a car that hasn't been is a bit sad. You just make yourself look a bit of a prat. Most people don't even know what an M car is but those who do just think its the car equivalent of sticking a sock down your pants.
Liam-O said:I'm all for M styling, bumpers, exhausts, aero skirts and bumper, not a problem, as they are an aesthetic improvement and do not relate to what is inside the engine bay.
The M badge however I feel is about the engine, and is a massive no no.
It's fine to have an unbranded watch that may look like a Rolex, which is styling, when you put a Rolex badge on, it relates to what is inside, and that makes it a FAKE!
lux good said:///M Snobery at it's best, Darren and Tom!!! :roll:
ranski said:Many a late night at Wobble down branston street
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
My thoughts exactly! Styling to improve a cars looks or to stand out from the crowd is all good, but a badge that implies your something your not..... :thumbsdown: Like putting a 'Turbo' sticker on a NA car?!Liam-O said:I'm all for M styling, bumpers, exhausts, aero skirts and bumper, not a problem, as they are an aesthetic improvement and do not relate to what is inside the engine bay.
The M badge however I feel is about the engine, and is a massive no no.
It's fine to have an unbranded watch that may look like a Rolex, which is styling, when you put a Rolex badge on, it relates to what is inside, and that makes it a FAKE!
lolben g said:I saw an e60 520d ///M the other day in tesco car park. A simple thought of ''cock'' entered my mind.
ben g said:.
Also one saw a jaguar s type, type r. Very strange.