And if you look at the last year the public have not acted responsibly.Nanu said:The point is this travel stuff is only advice and not Law as Matt Hancock said, they hope the public will act responsibly. There are some circumstances where a person can travel too or from a red or amber listed country but the quarantine rules then apply when they enter the UK.Nictrix said:Im not saying that you dont understand what they have said but,Nanu said:Having watched Boris and Matt Hancock today saying don't travel to red listed countries, only travel to Amber if urgent but quarantine on return, and you can holiday to green listed countries but still have to be tested, I found it very frustrating to watch BBC presenters on The One show ALL say it was confusing? What exactly is confusing?
Am I super intelligent (Don't think so) or is it the media just trying to tell us it's confusing to create an anti govt. story?
If you are not allowed to travel to red listed countries then the sensible thing to do would be to stop flying planes there.
If there is a flight going somewhere and people can book a ticket they will go. If there are no planes going to these countries you cannot book a ticket therefore you cannot go.
I saw something the other day about flights coming in from India while they were talking about the worrying Indian variant, there were half a dozen planes a day coming in, probably still is.
As such the airlines who want to make money still fly to these places and are not bothered if their passengers then have to quarantine.
My other question would be if traveling is against Govt advice then surely these people must realise their insurance will be null and void if they try to claim on it?
Give people an inch and they will take a mile.
Letting people decide for themselves whether or not they should go to an area where they could potentially bring back another strain of the virus should not even be on the table.
I do hope I am wrong but I can see this heading in the wrong direction in a few months time.