No - but i have just seen it and am equally disgusted by it!ben g said:Does it really need quoting a thousand times?
I'm just having my say like most others have.
No - but i have just seen it and am equally disgusted by it!ben g said:Does it really need quoting a thousand times?
Marius said:The best think it's 2.2 engine :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: f***ing discussing ,hope you crash and die :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
markeg said:Hey Bing - how's the T shirt run going, may have a few more members in the club![]()
ben g said:Yes i've paid my f***ing tax.
Er no, it seems you haven't :lol:
Apologies if you have, but not displaying is still illegal for now.
ben g said:There are no trade plates on the front of that car in those images. Most likely on private land anyway.
El Taco said:
who ever you are Mr Taco I think I like you bradmarsh1989 said:I think enough attention has been given towards marius's comment. frankly It was out of line but im not sat crying in the corner of a cold shower over it. it confuses me how prople still actually believe I give a damn about the reactions this car causes.
anyway... moving swiftly forward thanks for all the votes on the colour I will definately pick a colour will suit the car.
I have decided that the car needs another months work back in the bodyshop some small changes need to be made to the aesthetics before I am happy with the profile of the car. I have a friend of mine taking the car under his wing a week on monday to make the amends... some small changes need to be made to the underside to improve drivability and then yeah. paint time!
