D
Deleted member 32480
Guest
ronk said:Waiting for the stats to arrive!
Never change Ronk.PerryGunn said:covid.jpg
I think you are supposed to put your selfie in your profile picture buddy.
ronk said:Waiting for the stats to arrive!
Never change Ronk.PerryGunn said:covid.jpg
mgrlane said:ronk said:Waiting for the stats to arrive!Never change Ronk.

PerryGunn said:Probably the same reason you (or mgrlane) have posted about 'some random nobody' thousands of miles away that has suffered adverse reaction to a covid vaccine...Flyingfifer said:I do wonder though, why the BBC feels the need to do a report on some random nobody 5000 miles away, gotta sell that narrative somehow!
'gotta sell that narrative somehow!...
OK, in that case, replace 'thousands' with 'hundreds' - your reply is a prime example of 'argumentum ad hominem' as a bit of hyperbole concerning the distances involved doesn't make it any less true that you constantly pursue a fear/uncertainty/doubt agenda.Flyingfifer said:...PerryGunn said:Probably the same reason you (or mgrlane) have posted about 'some random nobody' thousands of miles away that has suffered adverse reaction to a covid vaccine...Flyingfifer said:I do wonder though, why the BBC feels the need to do a report on some random nobody 5000 miles away, gotta sell that narrative somehow!
'gotta sell that narrative somehow!...
You talking about that lassie in England who is having to learn to walk again?
...
PerryGunn said:OK, in that case, replace 'thousands' with 'hundreds' - your reply is a prime example of 'argumentum ad hominem' as a bit of hyperbole concerning the distances involved doesn't make it any less true that you constantly pursue a fear/uncertainty/doubt agenda.
Unfortunately not, the 'personal attack' is only one form of an 'ad hominem', the most common beingFlyingfifer said:You might want to go and brush up on your fallacies Here is a useful site
...
I personally dont want the vaccine and want people to be able to make up their own minds without being subjected to personal attacks (ad hominem :wink: )
Flyingfifer said:... try to deflect attention from your claim that I "constantly pursue a fear/uncertainty/doubt agenda", still waiting for your justification and evidence for said claim...
In various posts Flyingfifer said:This is my concern, because of the speed at which these were fired out the door, they simply have not been subject to the normal level of extreme testing that others have. The sudden realisation of things like clotting is a perfect example of that.
...
Furthermore there are now concerns that in addition to the Astra Zenica both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines also appear to cause blood clots at a similar level (a minuscule level BUT this is the issue of pushing something through testing, problems appear afterwards)
...
If side effects appear down the line you're utterly f*cked
...
...most vaccines go through a long process of testing on animals over a long period of time to track long term repercussions of their use as well as long term studies into human exposure. Unless we have a time machine squirreled away its impossible that this extent of testing was completed.... might also be why there was an legal invulnerability added to protect the companies should long term side effects appear.
...
To repeat, yet again, for the ??th time, we know for a fact that the virus has a very low risk for the young, we have absolutely no idea whatsoever what, if any or how severe any side effects of the vaccine might be.
There is an active shooter, you're in a safe room, you have a 98.8% chance of surviving, but you need to stay where you are and not escape or you can take a chance and run for the door, that will get you to safety from this shooter but the risks are completely unknown and there may be another shooter outside.... what do you do?
...
Lets try this, using the exact same logic Tim, do you know 100% with absolute certainty that there is no long term side effects whatsoever, potentially even one that you may simply die from?
You say it "dramatically reduces the .. potential death" I have a 98% chance to live through it if I even catch the thing... thats a 2% chance of death and only a 10% chance of Long COVID
We have absolutely no idea at all of any potential long term side effects, even in animal testing we only have, at MOST, a year of advanced notice.
...
A fit and healthy young woman now suffering from Functional Neurological Disorder following getting the vaccine, she will have to learn to walk again. You and others have touted the line of "its the intelligent thing to do to get the vaccine, why take the risk" yet here we have a woman who was perfectly healthy who may now never have a normal life.

sp3ctre said:Interesting debate... when people say it's none of my business whether they take the vaccine or not I understand the thought process. The problem is we haven't (in our lifetime) experienced anything like this before and there are other factors at play.
sp3ctre said:The issue simply isn't people who have been vaccinated feeling threatened by those who refuse to get vaccinated. From that perspective I've been double vaccinated so I don't care. The very real issue is someone who refuses to get vaccinated and decides "to take their chances" taking valuable ICU space and ventilators and putting at risk those who need them (car crash victims and other non-covid related things).
If you could refuse the vaccina and also waiver your right to the ICU and ventilators I'd say knock yerself out.... but as always, it's not so simple, is it?
You might also want to look at this from the US - dated March 2021mgrlane said:If you go deaf (500+ in the UK have already)- should it be ok to deny you treatment as you made the informed decision to take the covid therapy treatment?
ref for deafness:
https://yellowcard.ukcolumn.org/yellow-card-reports#[object%20Object]
john-e89 said:The vaccine isn’t 100% effective as yet, it also does suppress transmission. They are friends…? I’d say it’s absolutely their bloody business if your going in their home…!! They might have a no vaccine no entry rule which is their choice just as you not having the jab is yours.
mgrlane said:john-e89 said:The vaccine isn’t 100% effective as yet, it also does suppress transmission. They are friends…? I’d say it’s absolutely their bloody business if your going in their home…!! They might have a no vaccine no entry rule which is their choice just as you not having the jab is yours.
This empathises the point that it's splits people's opinion.
I don't think that I have the right to know their vaccination status. I expect that if people are unwell for them not to come and that's about it.
I was at a 30th Birthday party this weekend and there was around 20 of us there at one point. I don't think anyone was asking others of their vaccination status. In fact I can't even remember anyone talking about covid.
Do you have a policy in your home John that you want to see proof of your old pal's having a flu jab before you let them in?
john-e89 said:I have a very good friend whose on the bench about covid vaccine and has told me from day one. He also is quite happy not to come in if we don’t want him to, but at least he’s told us. All our other friends have had both jabs, we know because they tell us. I don’t think it’s too difficult to do that out of respect.
mgrlane said:john-e89 said:I have a very good friend whose on the bench about covid vaccine and has told me from day one. He also is quite happy not to come in if we don’t want him to, but at least he’s told us. All our other friends have had both jabs, we know because they tell us. I don’t think it’s too difficult to do that out of respect.
Do you let your friend in your house that hasn't had a jab?
john-e89 said:Why don’t you think it’s right that you tell your friends about your non vaccine..?
mgrlane said:john-e89 said:Why don’t you think it’s right that you tell your friends about your non vaccine..?
If a friend asks me then I am not going to not tell them but I do think it's non of my business your (or their) vaccination status.
Lets face it- everyone is spreading it and it's very marginal the efficiency of the "jab" in preventing people passing it on. I would be more concerned of my "city rat" friends who live in apartment blocks and shared offices coming over that were double vaccinated than another hermit like me who is unvaccinated and works from home.
I am interested to see where it stops in terms of your right to know someones medical history- I did ask you if felt like you needed to know if your mates had a flu jab? Kills alot of people each year so knowing that they have had one might help protect you?
I am not trying to pick at you, it's really interesting hearing other views on the subject.
john-e89 said:My own view is if you’re going to someone’s house then I think it’s only fair to tell them whether you’re/ me/whoever is vaccinated or not, it’s simply a respect thing as this virus is having catastrophic effects as you know. Just my view.