MC on Pistonheads

tomscott said:
Also on the 3.5mm headphone jack point... you will struggle to find a phone on the market with a headphone jack

No need - I currently use a USB-C to Jack cable (or Lightning cable if you have an older iPhone)
 
Fred Smith said:
plenty said:
I don't want or need screens in a car. My phone mounted to the windscreen with an adapter to fit a 3.5 mm plug does everything I need. I get why some folks like the neater integration without wires, but that's so far down my list as to be basically irrelevant. And I can't stand the modern trend of massive tablet-style screens in interiors, especially when they are required to control basic functions.

It should be illegal to use those screens whilst driving AND it should be an MOT fail for the screen in a car to be of any use at all whilst driving (for eg, a legal screen could be used for memory settings on electric seats, but not for adjusting the seats on the fly, or using air-con etc etc. I genuinely can't comprehend how screens in cars have become a thing... surely a world sophisticated enough to make functioning brakes and seatbelts a requirement then not having massive distractions should be obvious?!?!?).

£11,250 sounds pretty cheap. And tempting if it were available at that.

I agree on the screens and I've got one. Having to flick through menus to alter things like temperature is a regression in safety. A lot of the screen aren't very well laid out either. It can be multiple swipes and scrolls to get to some basic functions.

Android Auto is very good for a lot of functions to do with navigation and music.
 
Fred Smith said:
I meant from the safety point of view! Why didn't they abolish seat belts and MOTs at the same time as introducing screens?
I suppose there isn't enough evidence yet to show that screens are detrimental to safety, even if intuitively this would seem to be the case. Despite how much I personally dislike driver aids and the excess weight that modern cars carry, I can't argue with traffic statistics that overwhelmingly show that cars are becoming safer. Maybe the detrimental impact of screens is masked by the advances made elsewhere.

Fred Smith said:
Surely the outside of a car is all about form over function? I am less opinionated on the E85, but the E86 is practically begging to have the biggest wheels possible stuck on there!
Wheels and tyres aren't just a styling feature :) At the risk of going off on another old-man rant, one thing that narks me even more than screens is the modern trend to 'fill the arches' with zero consideration for ride or handling. Oh, and the tyre companies are taking advantage of your vanity by selling you massively overpriced tyres. It doesn't cost them that much more to make tyres in 19" or 20" above, so why do consumers pay so much more?
 
Fred Smith said:
My E86 came with 19s and I think the car really suits them. I would very much like to buy a classy set of 18s, if only for comparison's sake and to put on if / when I refurb the 19s.
Don't get me wrong, a set of CSLs on an E86 look larvely. And 326s suit the older cars as well. And the tradeoff vs 18s in terms of harsher ride and added unsprung weight is going to be acceptable for most people most of the time.
 
beanie said:
Who knows? I might be wrong about all of that, but if I had a crystal ball then I’d have bought the 964 or Clio V6 I considered when I got the Z4!

My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more :(
 
Fred Smith said:
"If you bought the Z4M as an investment, then you made a poor choice. Far too niche and not widely admired at launch."

Surely "niche" makes it a good investment as it's rarer?

It should, and long term it quite possibly will. My point is that they’ve been a slow mover for years and years and thinking anything would change drastically in the immediate future was, imo, a gamble too far.

Fred Smith said:
As for "not widely admired"... not going to argue, but why? In theory sure the logic should be "BMW - good. M - good. Two seater sports car - good. Fantastic two seater sports cars - very very expensive. Z4MC - great option!" I have a theory that people think of saloons (and the normal coupes / tourings) when they think of BMW and that people looking for a sports car simply don't think BMW.

It’s got all the boxes ticked as far as I’m concerned, but reviews of the day have a big impact on future values in the short to medium term at least. If it came out today I’m sure it would be a 5star classic from the off.

You might be right about people’s associations and the brand and it makes me wonder if the Z3M would have become so desirable had they not put the S54 in at the end, thus dragging the S50 models up with it.
 
DevonPaul said:
beanie said:
Who knows? I might be wrong about all of that, but if I had a crystal ball then I’d have bought the 964 or Clio V6 I considered when I got the Z4!

My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more :(

Those bloody things have also gone crazy. They were 20k forever. Until they weren’t!
 
beanie said:
DevonPaul said:
My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more :(

Those bloody things have also gone crazy. They were 20k forever. Until they weren’t!

The MC will be the same. I suspect it will take off in value about 6 months after we sell ours. We looked at a huge variety of cars when we ended up with the Big Blue Italian Moneypit (Maserati Gransport - the next big thing, values only going one way, lost 25% in 9 years and cost 50% of the purchase price in running costs). The other options we looked at in the £30-50k bracket are now all out of our price range. Having said that the running costs of some of them would also have been a bit eye watering, but the Morgan aero springs to mind as one we actually trested but Ann found it too snug.
 
DevonPaul said:
beanie said:
DevonPaul said:
My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more :(

Those bloody things have also gone crazy. They were 20k forever. Until they weren’t!

The MC will be the same. I suspect it will take off in value about 6 months after we sell ours. We looked at a huge variety of cars when we ended up with the Big Blue Italian Moneypit (Maserati Gransport - the next big thing, values only going one way, lost 25% in 9 years and cost 50% of the purchase price in running costs). The other options we looked at in the £30-50k bracket are now all out of our price range. Having said that the running costs of some of them would also have been a bit eye watering, but the Morgan aero springs to mind as one we actually trested but Ann found it too snug.

When you do sell, let me know and I’ll make sure to hold on for a little while :lol:

I bought mine 11 years ago with the expectation of it being a fairly safe bet and only losing a couple of K in a few years. In that respect it’s done well.

In Europe and the USA they’re valued much higher, so it would make sense that they eventually follow suit in the UK. It’s anyone’s guess as to when and by how much though.
 
Getting a result profit-wise with a car is a really slow old game unless the market is in overdrive and you are lucky to hit a trend at the start of the curve. And it all changes as we get older. 50s cars such as MGAs (eg) are no longer desirable unless they are restomods. It’s because the old gits that bought them no longer drive or are dead. Almost the same with MGBs. I mean I am in my early 60s and I have zero interest in buying a car from earlier than the 90s. Taking a diversion for a second, I am having real trouble selling some lovely 20 year old bikes. I wondered why until I realised that every buyer has a new bike on PCP every three years and doesn’t want the hassle. And I foresee the bike market will collapse completely in 20 years time as all the riders die off. Unlike my time guys no longer start their motoring life on bikes…..

Back to cars and their values. Some do go crazy quickly. But most don’t. It’s a slow process. I sold a s54 Z3MC for a NSX as a straight swap in 2005. The NSX stuck at around 20-25k for about ten years. In 2015 or so they began to be remembered and lusted after - and not now just by the Gran Turismo “modifier” generation. Luckily I kept mine very nice, unmodded, and well maintained. At 14,000 miles (yes I know I should get out more) it is now a six figure sum vehicle. I didn’t buy it for that (it is my third NSX) but even if it was an investment it’s taken me 20 years……
 
In that vein, buying an Z4MC was a nice thing to do but as an investment - not at all and any increase will be much more offset by running costs.
But I also have a i8 Roadster which is fairly rare, fairly odd, dauntingly complex, very niche and not really bought at the time. But well regarded by those who know. A bit like my NSX. I really do think the i8 Roadster will have its day - it’s less common than a Z8 for example - the question is will I be dead before it happens. Yea probably…..
 
pvr said:
tomscott said:
Also on the 3.5mm headphone jack point... you will struggle to find a phone on the market with a headphone jack

No need - I currently use a USB-C to Jack cable (or Lightning cable if you have an older iPhone)

Why would you want to connect via a cable. It's a pain and not very sightly especially if you need to charge it too. Non of the audio systems are good enough to notice a quality difference of a cable vs bluetooth anyway.

All this chat about not touching anything in the car, so how are you navigating? Set your phone and off you go right... Apple CarPlay/android auto is designed to do exactly the same thing the difference is you can have the apps you want to use not the rubbish built in nav systems. On top its designed to use your steering wheel buttons for changing tracks etc

All this stuff is strictly overseen and meets CE standards so honestly I don't really know what all the BS is about honestly. Sounds like half of these people have opinions but havent actually used it...

The newer built in systems where you have to navigate through menus to change the HVAC etc are a much bigger risk than that, but guess what that's all allowed too under the same governance.
 
At the moment on the Z, the cable is the only AUX way I have until I look into the sound system
 
Fred Smith said:
tomscott said:
Why would you want to connect via a cable. It's a pain and not very sightly especially if you need to charge it too.

Because one of my ambitions in life is to spend as little time as possible messing around with unnecessary technology and manuals, and a simple 3.5mm jack is the easiest way of connecting.

Whilst I don't want to be driving a var with half eaten KFC strewn across the floor I can handle the unsightliness of one little cable.

In terms of navigation -

Most journeys I know exactly where I am going

Next most common I have a passenger who can navigate

If neither of the above apply I go online and look at the journey and make notes and use google streetview to look at the less obvious junctions, then when I come to do the journey I don;t need to use the notes (writing them drummed the text into my head) and I know exactly what the road looks like where I need to turn off.

Clearly the law is not fit for purpose if it allows people to mess around on screens when driving (only it kinda doesn't - when you kill somene because you were looking at a screen not the road you'll still get done even if it's not an automatic crime to use the screen)

Your ambition is not to spend time messing with technology but you would go to that level to get direction that's irony if ive ever seen it!

You really go to that effort instead of just using google maps or something of that nature...

I think this is probably the end of this convo as I think your an isolated niche case. The whole point of technology is to make your life easier if I had the time to do that... I still wouldn't as using google maps is click and go.

It's not just about you know where you are going, it will tell you there is traffic, accidents to be able to avoid and not sit in traffic for hours. I do a lot of long journeys and honestly couldnt imagine not having these simple pieces of tech to aid a journey.

BTW like I said apple carplay is built in to your system you press go and leave it... the difference is it mirrors a small select set of apps from your phone to your car aid your journey. There is very little you can do with it outside basic things that mean you don't play with it while driving. I have applecar play and don't spend my journey messing around with the screen, I press and go if I want to change a track I use the steering wheel.

So if you kill someone while you're messing with HVAC or looking at your speedo... that's different? :headbang:

I don't really know what else to say to you, I have a feeling you have never used it.
 
Fwiw I like the fact that my Z4MC has no nav and the hifi is crap. I use my wife and her google maps/waze on her iPhone for the former and my ears are so buggered by constant loud music and motorcycle helmets that a good system would now be wasted on me. In any case the eventuri would drown it out. No parking sensors either - agsin use the wife. I have tech including car play on my i8 but I still use my wife and her phone…..sometimes I might be bothered to talk to the car with an address.
 
Back
Top Bottom