.
plenty said:I frequently wonder why so many people willingly hand over so much of their hard-earned to drive something that (to me) is vastly less interesting than something built 15-20 years ago and worth 1/10th of the value.
I think it comes down to three factors:
'1. 'Newness' - people are naturally attracted to new things and the 'latest model', assuming that newer must always equal better.
2. Risk mitigation and minimum hassle - there is still a widespread belief that older cars are risky, and something newer with a warranty offers peace of mind and predictability. Notwithstanding the fact that those hefty monthly lease payments would cover a very generous borkage fund for any used car. And most people I know have zero interest in getting the slightest bit hands-on. Why would they, if they're not enthusiasts like us?
3. Perceived safety. When I ask someone why they've chosen their 2-tonne panzer with lane assist, adaptive cruise and which goes 'bong' when someone's in your blind spot, the answer is almost inevitably because 'it's safer on the school run'. We could debate that all day long, but as a motivation I think it's understandable.
Ed Doe said:One thing I would say however; I would consider a bmw i3 as a runabout - I think they're fascinating bits of kit, and with the little petrol engine in the back you're not absolutely screwed when the battery dies.
pvr said:Ed Doe said:One thing I would say however; I would consider a bmw i3 as a runabout - I think they're fascinating bits of kit, and with the little petrol engine in the back you're not absolutely screwed when the battery dies.
Is their range still something like 75 miles or so?
Fred Smith said:What did the original post red Z4MC sell for in the end?
Massively cheaper than a proper dashboard to produce. And rather like the comically large wheels with rubber bands for tyres that are the norm today, a triumph of form over function.Fred Smith said:I genuinely can't comprehend how screens in cars have become a thing...