tomscott said:Also on the 3.5mm headphone jack point... you will struggle to find a phone on the market with a headphone jack
No need - I currently use a USB-C to Jack cable (or Lightning cable if you have an older iPhone)
tomscott said:Also on the 3.5mm headphone jack point... you will struggle to find a phone on the market with a headphone jack
Fred Smith said:plenty said:I don't want or need screens in a car. My phone mounted to the windscreen with an adapter to fit a 3.5 mm plug does everything I need. I get why some folks like the neater integration without wires, but that's so far down my list as to be basically irrelevant. And I can't stand the modern trend of massive tablet-style screens in interiors, especially when they are required to control basic functions.
It should be illegal to use those screens whilst driving AND it should be an MOT fail for the screen in a car to be of any use at all whilst driving (for eg, a legal screen could be used for memory settings on electric seats, but not for adjusting the seats on the fly, or using air-con etc etc. I genuinely can't comprehend how screens in cars have become a thing... surely a world sophisticated enough to make functioning brakes and seatbelts a requirement then not having massive distractions should be obvious?!?!?).
£11,250 sounds pretty cheap. And tempting if it were available at that.
I suppose there isn't enough evidence yet to show that screens are detrimental to safety, even if intuitively this would seem to be the case. Despite how much I personally dislike driver aids and the excess weight that modern cars carry, I can't argue with traffic statistics that overwhelmingly show that cars are becoming safer. Maybe the detrimental impact of screens is masked by the advances made elsewhere.Fred Smith said:I meant from the safety point of view! Why didn't they abolish seat belts and MOTs at the same time as introducing screens?
Wheels and tyres aren't just a styling featureFred Smith said:Surely the outside of a car is all about form over function? I am less opinionated on the E85, but the E86 is practically begging to have the biggest wheels possible stuck on there!
Don't get me wrong, a set of CSLs on an E86 look larvely. And 326s suit the older cars as well. And the tradeoff vs 18s in terms of harsher ride and added unsprung weight is going to be acceptable for most people most of the time.Fred Smith said:My E86 came with 19s and I think the car really suits them. I would very much like to buy a classy set of 18s, if only for comparison's sake and to put on if / when I refurb the 19s.
beanie said:Who knows? I might be wrong about all of that, but if I had a crystal ball then I’d have bought the 964 or Clio V6 I considered when I got the Z4!
Fred Smith said:"If you bought the Z4M as an investment, then you made a poor choice. Far too niche and not widely admired at launch."
Surely "niche" makes it a good investment as it's rarer?
Fred Smith said:As for "not widely admired"... not going to argue, but why? In theory sure the logic should be "BMW - good. M - good. Two seater sports car - good. Fantastic two seater sports cars - very very expensive. Z4MC - great option!" I have a theory that people think of saloons (and the normal coupes / tourings) when they think of BMW and that people looking for a sports car simply don't think BMW.
DevonPaul said:beanie said:Who knows? I might be wrong about all of that, but if I had a crystal ball then I’d have bought the 964 or Clio V6 I considered when I got the Z4!
My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more![]()
beanie said:DevonPaul said:My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more![]()
Those bloody things have also gone crazy. They were 20k forever. Until they weren’t!
DevonPaul said:beanie said:DevonPaul said:My options were the V6 clio or a Honda NSX for £5k more![]()
Those bloody things have also gone crazy. They were 20k forever. Until they weren’t!
The MC will be the same. I suspect it will take off in value about 6 months after we sell ours. We looked at a huge variety of cars when we ended up with the Big Blue Italian Moneypit (Maserati Gransport - the next big thing, values only going one way, lost 25% in 9 years and cost 50% of the purchase price in running costs). The other options we looked at in the £30-50k bracket are now all out of our price range. Having said that the running costs of some of them would also have been a bit eye watering, but the Morgan aero springs to mind as one we actually trested but Ann found it too snug.
pvr said:tomscott said:Also on the 3.5mm headphone jack point... you will struggle to find a phone on the market with a headphone jack
No need - I currently use a USB-C to Jack cable (or Lightning cable if you have an older iPhone)
Fred Smith said:tomscott said:Why would you want to connect via a cable. It's a pain and not very sightly especially if you need to charge it too.
Because one of my ambitions in life is to spend as little time as possible messing around with unnecessary technology and manuals, and a simple 3.5mm jack is the easiest way of connecting.
Whilst I don't want to be driving a var with half eaten KFC strewn across the floor I can handle the unsightliness of one little cable.
In terms of navigation -
Most journeys I know exactly where I am going
Next most common I have a passenger who can navigate
If neither of the above apply I go online and look at the journey and make notes and use google streetview to look at the less obvious junctions, then when I come to do the journey I don;t need to use the notes (writing them drummed the text into my head) and I know exactly what the road looks like where I need to turn off.
Clearly the law is not fit for purpose if it allows people to mess around on screens when driving (only it kinda doesn't - when you kill somene because you were looking at a screen not the road you'll still get done even if it's not an automatic crime to use the screen)