TitanTim said:-------research has shown 80% of BMW owners think their car is front wheel drive --------
I'm amazed at that!
TitanTim said:-------research has shown 80% of BMW owners think their car is front wheel drive --------
Z4M-2006 said:Interesting clip.....Shows the differences in the 2 cars...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQhVW3PIRhA
ronk said:TitanTim said:-------research has shown 80% of BMW owners think their car is front wheel drive --------
I'm amazed at that!
john-e89 said:. I think the problem with the E89 35i as a future classic is the Z4M, the E89 has no \\\M pedigree so will be less sought after![]()
Tim.
john-e89 said:Fair point Tim, however I do think the 35is offers a lot more kit which will make it as least as desirable as an M in an admittedly niche market, but the low numbers will deal with that and keep prices for nice ones strong. If there were lots more of them then yes I doubt the same would count.
....and I could well be,and probably am, talking tosh too.![]()
GuidoK said:The e85 ragtop is not cheap imho. :?
GuidoK said:The e85 ragtop is not cheap imho. :?
original guvnor said:It's not a great surprise that a 35iS is as quick (or quicker) than a Z4M in that track video. For a start it's at least 5 years newer technology, on a car that had an RRP £3k higher with very similar power and a boat load more torque. Frankly the fact that a Z4M can keep it honest, is a testament to the M Division.
I personally don't think the 35iS will attract much of a following as a classic in the future but it's all conjecture really isn't it? We none of us know. My reasoning is that it has little pedigree - it didn't go racing (the E86M did), it's not an M, it doesn't have any uniqueness in its engineering either - it's not the last straight six NA M car with no driver aids or DCT for example. There is no curio about it other than the fact it was low volume and top of the E89 tree.