shawna said:Good thread loved the fishing for women with 100k+ haha

marchantsuk said:shawna said:Good thread loved the fishing for women with 100k+ haha
But no takers as yet![]()
PerryGunn said:ab7 said:jimbo1958 said:I've voted and I'm not on over 100k. If I was I wouldn't be hanging here with you load of Scrotes.![]()
Tbh if I was on over 100k I'd probably look beyond a zed...![]()
As people have said, it's not income per se but disposable income that counts - large mortgages, ex-wives and child maintenance payments can eat up huge chunks of post-tax income and sometimes people who you think should be quite well off have less in their pocket than the average early-20s worker who lives at home with mum and dad.
Sae said:In the grander scheme of things anyone with a modern mortgage, a family and paying the "morally correct" taxes won't have much disposable income on £100k...
Would be completely different if you were single though putting your income through IOM :?
Taz x said:Sae said:In the grander scheme of things anyone with a modern mortgage, a family and paying the "morally correct" taxes won't have much disposable income on £100k...
Would be completely different if you were single though putting your income through IOM :?
so what how do those on say 25k survive?
mr wilks said:all this talk about salary/expenditure/disposable income reminds me of a book i read a couple of years ago .
only wish i had read it in my twenties though .
put's a great perspective on the way we live our financial lives & how to see things as assets or liabilitys :?
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Rich-Dad-Poor-Robert-Kiyosaki/dp/1612680003/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1354818275&sr=1-1
i still have it if anyone wants to read it . will happily mail it to you![]()