disappointed. ..

ruggedscot said:
Disappointed ? Nah. Its not a out and out sports car is it, its more of a cruiser and as its been pointed out 0-60 in 6.5 aint no slouch. Id say its pretty well rounded for what its meant to be used for and thats a fun car. Its for A to B with the roof down and enjoying the drive - its not meant for super fast track days, even the 35 isnt geared for that.


+1...... :thumbsup:
 
It all comes down to what you need and want? The E89 is a more refined car, but for me slightly misses the point. That being said for 90% of the target audience of the Z the E89 does a better job. More comfortable looks nice and has updated toys. The E85/6 will always be a more fun drive tho IMO.
 
TitanTim said:
tomscott said:
The E85/6 will always be a more fun drive tho IMO.

If talking of Ms I think that's reserved for the Z3M :wink:

Tim.

Have you ever driven the 4M's Tim? Not intended as a dig, just curious because i think a lot of people who haven't don't appreciate how "different" (notice I didn't say better for the sake of peace-keeping) it feels.
 
You'll need two hands Cazza :wink:

...and OG, i'll have a blast in your M at the next meet, just to see what all the fuss is about!! :D
 
original guvnor said:
TitanTim said:
tomscott said:
The E85/6 will always be a more fun drive tho IMO.

If talking of Ms I think that's reserved for the Z3M :wink:

Tim.

Have you ever driven the 4M's Tim? Not intended as a dig, just curious because i think a lot of people who haven't don't appreciate how "different" (notice I didn't say better for the sake of peace-keeping) it feels.

I have yes, albeight a while ago now. I guess the comparison I can give between the Z3M and Z4M both roadsters wouldn't be a fair one as the Z3M was on a track day and the Z4M which I was looking to buy at the time was on a test drive so I was being careful but personally I would have a Z3M over a Z4M all day long, to me it felt a more tetchy exciting car to drive. BMW would never make anything in the same vein as the Z3M again. But its also down to looks for me, the Z3 has that timeless classic roadster look. The Bangle designs I feel suddenly became quite dated, I felt this when I had the E87 and when the F20 came out my car suddenly felt old hat. I don't feel that with the Z3, maybe beacause the design is so different from the Z4. I'm not knocking the Z4 but it never wooed me to replace the Z3 with one.

I was fuelling the Z3 up this morning at 6.30am and under the garage lights it looked superb and caught the eye of everyone who pulled onto the forecourt. Not bad for a 12 year old motor :)

Tim.
 
TitanTim said:
I was fuelling the Z3 up this morning...caught the eye of everyone who pulled onto the forecourt. Not bad for a 12 year old motor :)

Tim.

Probably in dis-belief that a man was driving a Z3 roadster :o


(Obviously in jest, given that I'm after a Z3 roadster myself :thumbsup: )
 
StevenH72 said:
TitanTim said:
I was fuelling the Z3 up this morning...caught the eye of everyone who pulled onto the forecourt. Not bad for a 12 year old motor :)

Tim.

Probably in dis-belief that a man was driving a Z3 roadster :o


(Obviously in jest, given that I'm after a Z3 roadster myself :thumbsup: )





Just to wet your apetite :)

Tim.
 
ronk said:
Have you got an agreed value insurance on the car Tim?

I can't remember what the insurance value is on the policy, its only got just over 25k on the clock, but I doubt if I decide to trade in next spring I would get more than 2K if that. A dealer would probably sell it for £3995 to £4995 to make 1500 to 2K profit :cry:

It was a BMW AUC and paid 10,995 for it in 2008.

Tim.
 
Back
Top Bottom