tomscott said:The VMRs are reps. Dub had Morr wheels which are forged and are very very expensive.
Ah that's them Tom. Thanks
tomscott said:The VMRs are reps. Dub had Morr wheels which are forged and are very very expensive.
tertius said:I have a set of Apex wheels. I wanted the ARc 8 but they don't have the clearance for the AP calipers so went for EC-7.
Very nice wheels and pretty light, but slightly inconvenient to get in the UK.
Also agree 18s are much cheaper for track rubber. And tyres generally of course.
DONDP said:tertius said:I have a set of Apex wheels. I wanted the ARc 8 but they don't have the clearance for the AP calipers so went for EC-7.
Very nice wheels and pretty light, but slightly inconvenient to get in the UK.
Also agree 18s are much cheaper for track rubber. And tyres generally of course.
Now that is very handy information indeed. Which AP set are you running? I run the AP setup with the narrower front caliper the CP5575.
Bit of a bummer if there isn't an Arc8 setup that will fit over the APs as I was led to believe they were lighter than the EC-7...
Hmmmm
original guvnor said:On Tom's car I think his 224's looked awesome and a bit different.
jimmybell said:I think its the PSS that have "attractive" sidewallsi noticed it when i put mine on!
I have to say i would definitely consider going for the Morr forged rims, they are in a different league.
jimmybell said:I looked at the Apex ones but i couldn't decide which i liked! Need to find more pics of the EC-8, i think they're the winners.
Where did you see them for sale?
Adamski said:Think they're CS wheels. 255 width would be a proper stretch on CSLs at the rear
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
DONDP said:CS wheels are still 9.5 J on the rear, exactly same part number as CSLs its the fronts that differ. The CS fronts are 8 J wide not 8.5 J.
original guvnor said:I get why people buy CSL's but they worsen the handling and ride quality which is presumably why BMW fitted the car with 224's. The only reason to fit them is aesthetic. The weight saving argument is a load of bollocks. After all this is a road car and driving to Tesco the unsprung weight reduction won't matter a lot. Ok, I know, I'm exaggerating but you get my point.
But as nice as they look I'm getting terribly bored by them at the moment.
On Tom's car I think his 224's looked awesome and a bit different.
I think those VMR's (is that the correct name for the wheel dubsed has fitted?) look a lot better. A lot more original too.
DONDP said:The Guvnors right if you really are concerned about the affects of wheel weight 18s are the way to go.
I am considering a move away from CSLs as my track wheel to set of 18 inch Apex Arc 8s. Lighter than CSLs and the 224s and look pretty tasty too:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/apexraceparts/sets/72157625965668652/detail/
Not to mention more tyre choice at lower prices for 18s
aquazi said:Personally i see both sides of the argument... And each to their own... But to fuel the flames a little (not that it needs it!)
When getting my wheels a few years ago i found weights of them and the VMR vb7 (or whatever they are which look like csl) actually weigh less then the genuine article.
Also you could get some Morr's or forgestars which look similar enough but would be far superior quality, weight and cost a lot more.. Are these still considered reps?!
Sent from my iPhone 5s using Tapatalk