Coupe vs Roadster

srhutch said:
Evil_elvis said:
I know it's an old thread but everyone says use the search!!!!!!!!

- no mention of which handles better or which is faster?
Surely the vert is heavier??
Or are they identical in weight, suspension, bracing etc?

Actually the coupe ways more, 10kg in ///M spec

And that is without the fatter coupe drivers as well :whistle:
 
pvr said:
And that is without the fatter coupe drivers as well :whistle:

How 'fat' are you? I'm willing to bet it's more than 10kg over 68kg. The weight is in the glass which is at the back and I don't mind a marginally more rearward weight bias.

I'll take the structural rigidity that's over double the roadster's thanks. :driving:
 
I was joking …

But to answer - 78 Kg when I had the roadster, but now I have a coupe it has crept up to 81 ...
 
To be frank, the coupe and roadster serve different purposes so depending on what you want will determine what's best.

If you want to waft your bonce in the airy breeze and enjoy a quite different sensation of open top motoring then the roadster rocks. If you want a decent boot and slightly better dynamics the coupe wins. Looks wise either wins but personal preference can swing it.

PS: I know you were joking but it's hard to convey the tone of response on the internet. :-)
 
Recently OG ( M coupe ) & Darren Stone ( M roady ) were out & swapped vehicles for a time
Both noticed differences in drive & handling with objective comments written on the virtues of both
Can't remember which thread it was in though :?
As for the OP question ? I was Coupe all the way until i ventured into a roadster , now i think a weekend car for me would need that extra element dropping the top offers & certainly in the M roady you realy get to hear where your money has gone :wink: intoxicating :driving:
 
Wanted a coupe, bought a roady and I wouldn't change now. It can't get better than a roof down with the S54 at full keg.

H.
 
Forged. Jonny's getting a cast iron turbo with a horse-drawn charge cooler :D
 
mr wilks said:
As for the OP question ? I was Coupe all the way until i ventured into a roadster , now i think a weekend car for me would need that extra element dropping the top offers & certainly in the M roady you realy get to hear where your money has gone :wink: intoxicating :driving:

If you love that M rasp and induction roar you can't beat the surround-sound aural orgasm that is the noise bouncing of trees, hedges walls and the atmosphere in general when you're blatting round the lanes with the top down. End of :thumbsup:
 
Have you though about an e89?

It is an improvement in most areas over the e85/e86 just not as enjoyable to drive in the twisties. Hard to think that the design of the e85 is now 12 years, well older than that if you consider development time.
 
If BMW hadn't made the M coupe then I'd never have bought a Z4. They look entirely different cars to me.
I love a sports car that has a nice flowing roof line down to the rear.
 
pvr said:
I was joking …

But to answer - 78 Kg when I had the roadster, but now I have a coupe it has crept up to 81 ...

Ah is that the quip about another car on the drive the other night when we we're having a bit of fun? I did consider asking if you had bought something. Any pics?
 
^ S2000 with the spoon(?) hard-top I think looks really good. But imo the s2k just should have been made a coupe. It just should have.
 
roadster looks better in the non m versions, the coupe looks better in the m? discuss.....but all look good and are ageing timelessly
 
Back
Top Bottom