lacroupade
Lifer
At the end of the day its chalk and cheese. You either want a car with a roof or you don't and you can't compare the two really as they are different things. Its a ridiculous, childish debate.
When I set out to buy my car I specifically wanted a roadster, not something with a roof, and with my requirements it came down to either an S2000 or the Zed, and the latter won it on looks and running costs, neither of which I've regretted. TBH had the facelifted TT been available I would have bought one, but it was a few months too early and I was impatient.
The simple fact is that it takes a particular type of individual to buy a roadster, and the two most typical reasons for buying are either (i) so they can look good in the street with the roof down (no harm in that), or (ii) because they just love to drive a ragtop. I favour both frankly LOL.
So you see, its easy to be calm, reasonable and objective about this and come up with a balanced, intelligent view on the issue.
At least it would be if coupes weren't so sucky. :rofl:
When I set out to buy my car I specifically wanted a roadster, not something with a roof, and with my requirements it came down to either an S2000 or the Zed, and the latter won it on looks and running costs, neither of which I've regretted. TBH had the facelifted TT been available I would have bought one, but it was a few months too early and I was impatient.
The simple fact is that it takes a particular type of individual to buy a roadster, and the two most typical reasons for buying are either (i) so they can look good in the street with the roof down (no harm in that), or (ii) because they just love to drive a ragtop. I favour both frankly LOL.
So you see, its easy to be calm, reasonable and objective about this and come up with a balanced, intelligent view on the issue.
At least it would be if coupes weren't so sucky. :rofl: