Calling Scottish Dwellers...

What a pathetic wee sh11te . . . would it not be more noble to stay in situ and help develop the future - shows you the real character of the man - there are times when stepping down is right but this shows nae bottle in my opinion !
 
He only wanted to be king /president- if he couldn't have that it was dummy out the pram time!
In the meantime he has let a big geni out the bottle!
 
ronk said:
Salmonds thrown himself on his sword!

He did look like a very dejected this morning. I honestly don't think that he should resign and see out his term. It was one of his manifesto policies and he did it, it just didn't pay off. Alex Salmond was never supposed to be a MSP as he was elected a MP and Nicola Sturgeon was always to be the leader of the SNP in Scotland and then the real chance came that they could possibly run Scotland and Alex Salmond back tracked and became leader of the SNP without contest and they did it.

I can understand why he feels that he has to go but honestly I don't think he should. Think Ms Sturgeon will be at the helm and if so three parties will all have female leaders in Scotland. How bizarre is that?
 
I've no issue at all with female leaders in politics or anywhere else for that matter but rather think Sturgeon is a political light weight - compared with e.g. Angela Merkel - good luck to her - she will need it.
 
jaxZ4 said:
I've no issue at all with female leaders in politics or anywhere else for that matter but rather think Sturgeon is a political light weight - compared with e.g. Angela Merkel - good luck to her - she will need it.

I can't think of anywhere else off the top of my head with 3 female leaders, thats why I find it strange but yes I don't think that she has the clout that they need but then I can't think of anyone else in the SNP either. John Swinney already had a shot and he was ousted, possibly Kenny MacKaskill but again not sure. People still haven't forgiven him for the Lockerbie Bomber release and we know how people hate to bring up the past when it comes to politics.
 
original guvnor said:
Just wanted to say to everyone who has contributed to this thread....a cracking good debate, respectful, knowledgeable, all of you. :thumbsup:

+1 :thumbsup: Makes a change, as some of these have been dragged into a slagging match and it shows once again just how great the folks and this forum is :thumbsup:
 
ronk said:
+ another one!


+ another one... Mostly. There's a few pretty offensive comments here and there that are deserving of a good hard slap, but to everyone's credit they've just risen above them and given them a severe ignoring :thumbsup:
 
Well the brown stuff has hit the fan in Glasgow.
People supporting the NO vote have started rioting against the Yes camp who had congregated in George Square.
There has been waving of union jacks (not a problem) and singing Rule Brittania (also not a problem)
But there is also No Surrender being sung and Nazi salutes and Saltires being burnt by people wearing Rangers tops.
This is not right.
I dont believe that any Scottish person would burn the Saltire and give Nazi salutes.
At the end of the day the No voters got their way so why cause this trouble?
What would it have been like if the vote went the other way?
I know that not all No voters behave like this and it is obviously a minority but I have a feeling that these people are not even from Glasgow and are just here to cause trouble, a bit like the football casuals that go to matches for a fight instead of the football.
 
Surely this is simply the usual Glasgow bigotry at play.

It was always going to happen - to be honest I was surprised it didn't happen sooner in the process (maybe it did of course).

No place in a modern democracy for these idiots.
 
Sounds like a bunch of sectarian idiots to me, as you mentioned Rangers football tops. Good old fashioned Glasgow!

The only time in my adult life I was ever asked what my religion was, outwith an official arena, was when I was 19. I had just joined the R.A.F. and this Scotsman on my course from Glasgow asked me. I was taken aback and asked him if it mattered one way or another? He was pretty persistent, in the end I had to tell him to go forth and mutiply. Dickhead.
 
I'm wondering how long it will be before England decide to have an Independence referendum? Surely thats next on the political agenda?
 
Don't think there is a lot of appetite for independence, more an appetite for fairness that one part of the country does not have to pay for the free stuff of another part.

I am paying for uni fees at 9k a year, Scotland nothing, I pay for prescriptions - Scotland nothing and there are plenty of day to day examples of where someone in England is really heavily stung financially whilst someone elsewhere in the same country gets it all for free - funded by my taxes.

It does not mean I want to get rid of Scotland or Wales or any other part of the country, it just means that I want it to be equal.
 
pvr said:
Don't think there is a lot of appetite for independence, more an appetite for fairness that one part of the country does not have to pay for the free stuff of another part.

I am paying for uni fees at 9k a year, Scotland nothing, I pay for prescriptions - Scotland nothing and there are plenty of day to day examples of where someone in England is really heavily stung financially whilst someone elsewhere in the same country gets it all for free - funded by my taxes.

It does not mean I want to get rid of Scotland or Wales or any other part of the country, it just means that I want it to be equal.

I agree, in the south east the government spend 87p per head where as in Scotland for example its £1.16. In fact the south east which excludes London has the lowest spend per head out of any area.
 
Back
Top Bottom