Buyers be aware

ronk said:
Ive just had a look on the DVLA page and it shows CX 07 CXA as a Yellow JCB
:rofl: :rofl:
You definitely wouldn't want a gearbox fault with one of those! :lol:
 
Might be worth posting a link to this on the "Dealer Feedback" part of the forum. Could stop someone else going through the same experience.
 
Roberltd2 said:
ronk said:
Ive just had a look on the DVLA page and it shows CX 07 CXA as a Yellow JCB

Something is wrong!

I think that was a misprint on the OP's part Ron. I went down the same route.
Should have read CK07CXA I think.
Robert.

I thought there was a number plate hide process going on!
 
ronk said:
Roberltd2 said:
ronk said:
Ive just had a look on the DVLA page and it shows CX 07 CXA as a Yellow JCB

Something is wrong!

I think that was a misprint on the OP's part Ron. I went down the same route.
Should have read CK07CXA I think.
Robert.

I thought there was a number plate hide process going on!

Sorry folks... My mistake, I've corrected it now... No longer a JCB!
 
Roberltd2 said:
Might be worth posting a link to this on the "Dealer Feedback" part of the forum. Could stop someone else going through the same experience.

Thanks, I've put a link to this post in that part of the forum - much appreciated.
 
Dr_Tripwire said:
Roberltd2 said:
Might be worth posting a link to this on the "Dealer Feedback" part of the forum. Could stop someone else going through the same experience.

Thanks, I've put a link to this post in that part of the forum - much appreciated.

Keep your powder dry until your cash is returned!
 
Sorry to hear OP

Appreciate you are fuming but always tuck that away when dealing with the dealership. You have one goal, get your money back. Do whatever is necessary.

I wouldnt hold out much hope for the trading standards. On PH I was chatting on a thread where the issue was much much worse, and trading standards did all the same stuff, took the details, even VOSA inspected the rogue dealer and MOT station they were using to print false MOTs and sum total outcome...nothing.

Focus on getting your money back as a priority. Know the CRA like the back of your hand. Record all conversations with the dealership. Send followup special delivery signed for letters, etc. If you end up in court all this works in your favour.
 
Hope all goes well for you, something we all worry about. Only ever bought cars twice from dealers, one a good experience and one not so good. Same with private sales though but mostly okay, at least cars are cheaper privately so have money difference to put things right. The first z4 I looked at a dealer who was selling for one of 'his customers' so no warranty but still a very high price and needed stuff doing, so walked away.
 
Thanks for all your messages, money is back in the bank today. Trading standards are looking into the situation regarding the illegal actions of the dealers where they had me sign a document that stated that I was not to contact Trading Standards or make comment referring to their business which could be damaging to their reputation.

Additionally, they are looking into the falsified service history of my part exchange amongst other things.
 
Sorry to hear your story, I'd seen that car a few months ago but never got round to a test drive. From personal experience I've always had better cars from private owners than garages, too many bad experiences with them that I trust them less than a private seller.
I hope it works out for you.
 
Glad you got your refund. :thumbsup:
Buying from dealers is becoming more and more like the 'wild west' again IMO.

There needs to be much more legislation to control this industry. Car dealers don't care about selling cars. The cars are just the commodity to make them money. It could be bananas, or pork. The days of car dealers being interested in cars, or customer service are long gone.

As said earlier, I don't think trading standards will get anywhere, as they seem to only have teeth if enough people contact them.
If the dealers are shady, they will have multiple companies, swapping stock between themselves, to throw any snoopers off the scent. These people are generally not stupid. They just think that the car-buying public are. Most of the time they are right, sadly.

Just look at reviews for huge companies like Cazoo, etc.

I looked at a main dealer 'manufacturer approved' car today for £30k. It was a pile of crap. They are even sticking two fingers up at the manufacturer, who's franchise they are representing, as I don't believe they would condone the selling practices of the dealers if they knew.
 
Glad you got your money back OP.

Real shame this is sadly another example a bad dealer spoiling it for the good ones.

I appreciate people can only go by their own experiences but I do find it unfair to tarnish all car dealers as the same as it is simply not true.

From a personal point I can say I have seen good and bad from dealers and private buyers.
 
Dr_Tripwire said:
Thanks for all your messages, money is back in the bank today. Trading standards are looking into the situation regarding the illegal actions of the dealers where they had me sign a document that stated that I was not to contact Trading Standards or make comment referring to their business which could be damaging to their reputation.
Additionally, they are looking into the falsified service history of my part exchange amongst other things.

Was this hidden in the small print or did you knowingly sign agreeing to the terms? Either way what reputable company would have a contractual request like that.
Good to see you got your money back anyway 👍
 
Pondrew said:
mr wilks said:
Its not the last MOT test that alarms me , its the previous 2-3-4-5 :wink:
To be fair the MOT history isn't terrible and there isn't a 'pattern' of problems. It's not great but we are talking about a 15 year old car with 85k miles under it's belt.
It isn't beyond possibility that it was owned for the past 5 odd years by someone who rarely used it, especially as Z4s are often summer cars.
The main issue is with the gearbox and that wouldn't be checked or tested for an MOT. As long as it could move to do brake tests, which it obviously could.
I honestly think the OP could not have found the issues until he drove it.
Someone earlier criticised the OP for not having an RAC/AA inspection done. I don't think you should have to do that if buying from a dealer. Surely that is the whole point of buying from a dealer, who all claim they do '3 million point checks' on every vehicle they sell. It's all bollox and lies, none of them do them properly; if at all.

This one, as far as I can see, is purely down to a money-grabbing dealer, who couldn't give two shites about the quality of car they are selling.

Rant over (for now). :x

Guess its all down to how you want to read it :? i see a catalogue of the same minor issues over a period of years suggesting the owner clearly couldn't be bothered & that for me indicates the type of owner i wouldn't want to buy a car from .
Similarly If i enquired after a private car & the seller told me the car had peasant rubber id be looking elsewhere .
The car in question covered 700 miles in 3 years with recurring faults , its MOT dates are all over the place :| pointers for me to avoid & look elsewhere but maybe i'm over fussy ? or just untrusting & very wary when it comes to used cars :P
 
Bombardino said:
Dr_Tripwire said:
Thanks for all your messages, money is back in the bank today. Trading standards are looking into the situation regarding the illegal actions of the dealers where they had me sign a document that stated that I was not to contact Trading Standards or make comment referring to their business which could be damaging to their reputation.
Additionally, they are looking into the falsified service history of my part exchange amongst other things.

Was this hidden in the small print or did you knowingly sign agreeing to the terms? Either way what reputable company would have a contractual request like that.
Good to see you got your money back anyway 👍
Alarm bells.
 
Bombardino said:
Was this hidden in the small print or did you knowingly sign agreeing to the terms? Either way what reputable company would have a contractual request like that.
Not worth the paper it's written on TBH. Admittedly I would have walked away just from reading that (and would have had a very heated discussion about it too), but our consumer rights trump anything that these idiots try.
 
gerryp said:
Bombardino said:
Dr_Tripwire said:
Thanks for all your messages, money is back in the bank today. Trading standards are looking into the situation regarding the illegal actions of the dealers where they had me sign a document that stated that I was not to contact Trading Standards or make comment referring to their business which could be damaging to their reputation.

Outrageous :thumbsdown:
 
Back
Top Bottom