Today had the car geometry re-aligned.
My goto place is Automek in East Kilbride..they race/rally cars as part of their DNA..so a good place to go for sanguine advice.
I had disassembled most of the steering and suspension so I'd put it back together using an iPhone spirit level app and a 1m steel ruler.
Also the ride height had been upped about 30-40mm to approx standard Z4 ride height whereas earlier settings were based on the much lower ride height.
Bearing in mine there's been over 50 significant changes to the powertrain / chassis what follows is not standard!
For those not used to reading these charts a quick primer..
The top picture shows the settings BEFORE adjustment as is..the bottom picture shows the setting AFTER adjustment.
The colour coding is based on BMW's standard recommended settings. Green is good, red less so.
However working our way through this..
So I'd done a pretty good job on the front camber with my ruler and digital spirit level -0.9 both sides
Front toe in was off as I suspected but I'd not tried to adjust that.
Rear camber was so so, again I'd not tried to adjust it.
Rear toe was again so so..not miles out.
With these guys its like some sort of intellectual duel.. there's a multitude of questions and challenges.
Given my spec was:
High speed hooning, stability on bumps and at speed we ended up as follows:
Front castor (fixed by design, did have variable castor / camber plates but the noise, vibration, harshness NVH was too bad)
Without either machining the top of the strut tower or refitting camber plates I'd got as far as I could on the front camber..ideally for the tyres/wheels/power/weight/use 2 ish degrees would be nice..but we couldn't get that..
Toe we debated..they wanted zero toe..I negotiated a small amount of toe in for stability with more understeer than they would like.
Rear camber is to a large extent defined by front camber..rule of thumb is about 1 more degree on the rear than front..given modest front camber the rears were set at 2.0 ..BMW for ensuring massive under steer use 2.5.
Again rear toe was set on the dainty side..they really want the Yellow Peril turn and not just go in a straight line.
So how does it all feel..
Bearing in mind we have uprated tie rods, suspension arms, uprated arbs on max stiff, 80nm/96nm vs 60nm/70nm springs, stronger RTAB plates, bushes plus fully adjustable drop links and camber arms as well as the Ohlins...
Ride is definitely firmer, badly worn tarmac is definitely more jiggly at low speed...but...stability, tracking, turn in are all so so much more positive and assured. Hard to tell on wet and greasy roads, the NC500 in March will be a very good test. Ride on smooth roads is very good and as you can imagine bump control is mcuh more assured,,dampers are on 8 clicks, stock 10.


