Kolo Heights
Member
Wow talk about sabotaging a person's thread. Right to raise your concerns but should of done privately initially, IMHO.
Kryton said:torino said:High factory spec including:
- Electric Memory black leather heated seats ...................all 3.0 seats electric
- Air conditioning/climate control recently re-gassed(blows ice cold).......standard spec
- Electric roof/windows with full closure/open (from key)
- Roof has just been cleaned and protected.
- Cruise Control
- BMW Business CD and 6 CD changer
- Metallic Grey (Best colour imo) ...............standard spec
- Brushed Aluminum Trim .............ditto
- Sports Button ......................ditto
- Headlamp washers ....................ditto
- Auto Rain Sensing Wipers .................ditto
- Automatic lights ..................ditto
- Sports Suspension
- Tyre Pressure Sensors ..............ditto
- Trip Computer ....... ......ditto
- DTC Traction Control AND DSC Dynamic stability control ............ditto
- BMW factory Wind Protector
- Auto dip rear view mirror ..............ditto
- Heated Door Mirrors
- ABS, PAS, Front/Rear Fogs, Steering Wheel/Column Adjust. .... .........ditto
Don't call that "high spec" all the items listed by my bold are standard spec, you may fool "Jo Bloggs" with that add but not on here :roll:
"tried to pass off items that are standard spec as optional equipment"

With all respect Rob, I think there has to be a bit of responsibility on any buyer to find that information before making a purchase. By law the responsibility lies on the buyer to ask, not the seller to disclose. I touched on the morality of that in my earlier post and I still think in this case Torino appeared to be upfront about this being cat D.ZermattV said:I think we sometimes need to let the mods get on with their roles , the description for sale of this car on pistonheads still down plays the extent of the damage to some tune -" It basically required a new n/s head lamp, n/s wing " - the damage from the photos posted at the time that are now deleted showed far more extensive damage to bonnet .
How would you all feel if you were a new member on this great site purchased a car and then at a later date went through the history of the car and found photos of the car in a state where the damage is greater than advertised on the forum.
easty027 said:jesus, i thought id stumpled on the boxster forum for a minute.
a11y said:This is probably the one aspect of z4-forum that really disappoints me![]()
The guy's put up a for sale thread. He's mentioned it's a Cat D quite clearly IMO. The onus has to be on the buyer to do the research on ANY car they're buying. Legally Torino's done nothing. Morally I don't think he's done anything wrong either as he's mentioned the Cat D aspect. I don't think he has to go into every exact nut and bolt that was replaced. Yes, I'd be more impressed if he had done this as it would show ultimately more transparency/honesty, but that's no reason to shoot him down in flames. It's easy enough for a any buyer worth their salt to check a seller's previous posting history, or do the correct checks on the car (HPI, visual, mechanical inspection, etc).
I HATE all this "it's not worth that" comments being posted on other folk's for sale threads. My thoughts are that if you've got comments to make, by all means make them but do it via PM.
I'VE SUGGESTED IT BEFORE AND I'LL SUGGEST IT AGAIN (THIS TIME IN BOLD...): ONCE A FOR SALE THREAD IS POSTED, THE THREAD SHOULD THEN BE LOCKED WITH ONLY THE ORIGINAL POSTER ABLE TO EDIT IT. THIS STOPS NEEDLESS CRAP/ARGUEMENTS DEVELOPING AS WELL AS STOPPING NEEDLESS BUMPING OF FOR SALE THREADS.
This is just my own opinion. I'm not a moderator (although I have been on other forums) but I am a regular user of this forum and hope my opinions are at least valued, slightly. This works well on other forums, and I hate to see this happeneing to z4-forum
Good luck with the sale Torino![]()
DPG said:a11y said:This is probably the one aspect of z4-forum that really disappoints me![]()
The guy's put up a for sale thread. He's mentioned it's a Cat D quite clearly IMO. The onus has to be on the buyer to do the research on ANY car they're buying. Legally Torino's done nothing. Morally I don't think he's done anything wrong either as he's mentioned the Cat D aspect. I don't think he has to go into every exact nut and bolt that was replaced. Yes, I'd be more impressed if he had done this as it would show ultimately more transparency/honesty, but that's no reason to shoot him down in flames. It's easy enough for a any buyer worth their salt to check a seller's previous posting history, or do the correct checks on the car (HPI, visual, mechanical inspection, etc).
I HATE all this "it's not worth that" comments being posted on other folk's for sale threads. My thoughts are that if you've got comments to make, by all means make them but do it via PM.
I'VE SUGGESTED IT BEFORE AND I'LL SUGGEST IT AGAIN (THIS TIME IN BOLD...): ONCE A FOR SALE THREAD IS POSTED, THE THREAD SHOULD THEN BE LOCKED WITH ONLY THE ORIGINAL POSTER ABLE TO EDIT IT. THIS STOPS NEEDLESS CRAP/ARGUEMENTS DEVELOPING AS WELL AS STOPPING NEEDLESS BUMPING OF FOR SALE THREADS.
This is just my own opinion. I'm not a moderator (although I have been on other forums) but I am a regular user of this forum and hope my opinions are at least valued, slightly. This works well on other forums, and I hate to see this happeneing to z4-forum
Good luck with the sale Torino![]()
Agree, they did it on The TT Forum and it worked a treat.
Stopped all the annoying bumping that goes on.