Vonlipvig said:I've watched the full video now and I have my verdict. The Z had the roof up when it was clearly dry, should have had it down, much better visibility![]()
buzyg said:jimbo1958 said:pvr said:Perhaps it was a 2.0 that just couldn't move quickly enough ... 8)
Was thinking it had to be a 4 pot....I'd be long gone in my 35i before the Citroen was anywhere near me.![]()
You still be there waiting for the turbo to kick in.![]()
pvr said:Perhaps it was a 2.0 that just couldn't move quickly enough ... 8)

cj10jeeper said:BMWZ4MC said:The DS is driving far faster than I would under the circumstances, and I suspect he moved into the near side lane immediately before coming into view, and did so without indicating (perhaps to undertake the van he subsequently hits). If so, blame can be apportioned to both the Zed driver and that of the DS. However, the Z4 crosses a solid white line when rejoining the main carriageway, so he is really the one at greater fault. As said, it sounds like he was driving like a nob even before this too.Nictrix said:Looking at it the DS was probably moving from the middle to the left lane and thats possibly why the Z driver thought it was clear to pull out.
This is supposition about undertaking . I' could argue the DS moved in to allow the faster white van past at what is a safe point. He did so after all the traffic was static and is 100% entitled to do so and with no signal. The Z4 made an illegal move crossing a solid white line
100% his fault
DinosaurEyes said:Regardless of who is to blame, I just felt sorry for the Z4 driver who is getting slated by everyone on the internet. At the end of the day it's a silly mistake and I'm sure they feel bad. Hope everyone is safe and unhurt, and they all get back on the road asap.
jimbo1958 said:pvr said:Perhaps it was a 2.0 that just couldn't move quickly enough ... 8)
Was thinking it had to be a 4 pot....I'd be long gone in my 35i before the Citroen was anywhere near me.![]()
Smartbear said:jimbo1958 said:pvr said:Perhaps it was a 2.0 that just couldn't move quickly enough ... 8)
Was thinking it had to be a 4 pot....I'd be long gone in my 35i before the Citroen was anywhere near me.![]()
A four pot would be far ahead of your car as you would still be in the petrol station wasting your money....![]()
Rob
.TitanTim said:[post]1390073[/post] Maybe he/she was having a bad day.
domsz4 said:anyone seen the video of the e89 crashing on the m60 that's currently on carthrottle ... looks nasty hope no one was injured no matter who the web is blaming
I saw that as well especially when viewing that part of the clip 1 frame at a time. Might explain that the Z4 driver saw him but did not see his movement to the lane he pulled out into. Still IMO the fault is with the Z4 driver.biojo said:does the other car look to be coming out of middle lane and into nearside
sill the z4s fault