hopz121 said:Do you have 17 inch wheels?
mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
Good rear camber result, is yours on standard M sport springs and standard tyre sizes?mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
Jamesw said:mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
I’m no expert on this, which is why I posted it, I imagine there’s different tolerances which are in an acceptable range but be interesting if anyone with more knowledge could add their thoughts

Still on m sport springs or you lowered?mjennings23 said:Jamesw said:mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
I’m no expert on this, which is why I posted it, I imagine there’s different tolerances which are in an acceptable range but be interesting if anyone with more knowledge could add their thoughts
I specifically went for near neutral front toe and less rear camber myself, preference really.
Yup, standard size wheels MACK, although they are MV3s so a lower offset. Don't think that makes any difference mind.
Oh, and I had changed a significant number of suspension components just before this was done, hence the "before" setup being horrible! Was a very interesting drive to the garage that day...![]()
Jamesw said:mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
I’m no expert on this, which is why I posted it, I imagine there’s different tolerances which are in an acceptable range but be interesting if anyone with more knowledge could add their thoughts
MACK said:Jamesw said:mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
I’m no expert on this, which is why I posted it, I imagine there’s different tolerances which are in an acceptable range but be interesting if anyone with more knowledge could add their thoughts
Did you ask for anything specific with this? For example the rear camber is no where near factory spec, it's closer to the settings for an M . Dont get me wrong that's no bad thing at all but I'm just wondering why they did that.
srhutch said:What did you guys pay for this?
Howcome you went for this set up, less twitchy? Just had mine lowered and oem aligned, but the dreaded tram lining is back so looking for something more neutral.mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
philbo909 said:Howcome you went for this set up, less twitchy? Just had mine lowered and oem aligned, but the dreaded tram lining is back so looking for something more neutral.mjennings23 said:Gone a bit different to my roadster, for comparison
IMG_1559.JPG
philbo909 said:I had the zed aligned last week to factory spec on eibachs and it's tramlining a bit, any experts on here able to advise what to tweak?
front toe +0.06' each side
camber -1.16'
caster 5.16'
rear toe +0.07' each side
camber -2.5'
back in on Friday to get tweaked and was thinking just bringing camber down on the rear, but not sure that'll actually change the tramlining?
less camber on the rear (aim for as close to front as possible) and a little more rear toephilbo909 said:I had the zed aligned last week to factory spec on eibachs and it's tramlining a bit, any experts on here able to advise what to tweak?
front toe +0.06' each side
camber -1.16'
caster 5.16'
rear toe +0.07' each side
camber -2.5'
back in on Friday to get tweaked and was thinking just bringing camber down on the rear, but not sure that'll actually change the tramlining?