What does 550 bhp give in terms of acceleration?

B21

Lifer
Scottish Borders
Site Supporter
Several folks have asked following the bigger turbos and tunes 'well how fast does it go?'

There are 3 issues with performance testing the car..

1) Where I live there is no access to a long, flat, open wide fast road to do any performance testing..this invalidates using a GPS data logger such as Dragy to come up with some standard figures as gradients impact the numbers.

2) The 0-60 is pretty brutal on the powertrain..somewhere north of 600 bhp there's a real danger of snapping drive axles and a bit further damage to the DCT box on full on drag starts.

3) Calculations show that with the current gearing, how the engine revs out and now holds peak power that the car given room should do between 190 and 200 mph..but that needs a lot of room.

I'm contemplating next year doing some high speed runs at Elvington.

However to paraphrase .since I'm not a Stig..we do have the Stig's Italian cousin.

I have a friend with a Yellow 35is in Rome..he's going down the same broad route..

Same CSRF down pipess, TTE500 turbos, Wagner EVO3 FMIC, tuner, similar turbo inlets,outlets, charge pipe and DCIS vs Mr.5 airbox mod..he doesn't have a LSD or big bore exhaust.

Engines tunes are very close.

He's now done some initial Dragy 100 kmph to 200 kmph acceleration figures (62 mph -125 mph)

And its pretty consistent around 7.78 seconds..

If you correlate the findings its pretty much linearly related to real BHP that any car produces..aerodynamic drag and subtleties don't really start to play that much in that time, distance and speed.

For comparision


E85 30i 20+ secs
G29 M40i (EU) 12.3
Z4M 12

Enjoy..


And here's a list of other stock cars

4.2 - Bugatti Veyron 16.4 Super Sport - 1183hp
4.6 - Koenigsegg Agera R - 1130hp
4.8 – Bugatti Veyron - 1001hp
5.0 - Koenigsegg Agera - 953hp
5.5 – Koenigsegg CCX - 806hp
5.7 – Koenigsegg CCR - 806hp
5.8 – Mosler MT900 GTR - 600hp
5.8 - Ferrari F12 - 740hp
5.9 - McLaren 12c - 625hp
6.0 - Porsche 918 - 795hp
6.1 - Mclaren F1 - 635hp
6.1 - Porsche RUF RT12 R - 750hp
6.2 - Pagani Zonda F - 602hp
6.3 - Lamborghini Aventador LP-700 - 700hp
6.3 - Porsche 911 GT2 RS - 620hp
6.4 - Porsche RUF RT12 S - 685hp
6.4 - Porsche Carrera GT - 612hp
6.5 – Pagani Zonda R - 750hp
6.7 - Ferrari Enzo - 651hp
6.8 - Ferrari GTB 599 - 612hp
7.0 - Mercedes SLR 722 - 650hp
7.1 - Corvette ZR1 - 638hp
7.2 - Porsche 991 turbo S 2013 - 552hp
7.2 - Lamborghini Murcielago LP 670 - 670hp
7.2 - Mercedes SLR Stirling Moss - 650hp
7.2 - Mercedes SLS - 563hp
7.2 - Mercedes SLR - 626hp
7.2 - Audi R8 V10 Plus (2013) - 550hp
7.3 - Porsche 911 997 GT2 - 530hp
7.4 - Ferrari 458 spider - 562hp
7.4 - BMW M6 (2012) - 560hp
7.4 - Ferrari FF - 660hp
7.5 - Porsche 911 Turbo S (2011) - 530hp
7.6 - Ferrari F430 Scuderia - 510hp
7.7 - Lexus LFA - 560hp
7.8 - Lamborghini Murcielago - 580hp
7.8 - Nissan GT-R (2012) - 550hp
7.8 - BMW M5 (2012) - 560hp
7.9 - Corvette C6 Z06 - 513hp
7.9 - Porsche 911 GT3 RS 4.0 - 500hp
7.9 - Porsche 911 Turbo PDK (2010) - 500hp
7.9 - Porsche 991 GT3 - 476hp
8.0 - Ferrari F50 - 520hp
8.0 - Ford GT - 550hp
8.0 - Viper SRT-10 2008 - 612hp
8.4 - Ferrari F430 - 489hp
8.4 - Lamborghini Gallardo Superleggera - 530hp
8.4 - Aston DBS - 517hp
8.4 - Porsche 996 GT2 - 460hp
8.4 - Porsche 997 Turbo auto - 480hp
8.6 - Porsche 997 Turbo manual - 480hp
8.6 - BMW M6 V10 - 507hp
8.6 - Jaguar XKR-S - 551hp
8.7 - Mercedes SL65 AMG - 612hp
8.7 - Nissan GT-R 2008 - 480hp
8.7 - Lamborghini Diablo VT - 492hp
8.8 - Audi RS6 - 579hp
8.8 - BMW M5 V10 - 507hp
8.8 - Mercedes C63 AMG Black - 457hp
8.9 - Mercedes S65 AMG (2008) - 612hp
9.0 - Porsche 996TT X50/Turbo 'S' - 450hp
9.0 - Porsche 997 GT3 RS - 415hp
9.1 - Lamborghini Gallardo SE - 519hp
9.1 - Audi S8 - 520hp
9.4 - Porsche 991 Carrera S - 400hp
9.5 - Bentley Continental Supersport - 630hp
9.6 - Panamera Turbo - 500hp
9.6 - Aston Vantage (2009) 517hp
9.6 - Wiesmann GT MF5 - 507hp
9.6 - Cadillac CTS-V - 564hp
9.7 - Porsche 996 Turbo - 420hp
9.9 - Mercedes E63 AMG -525
10.0 - BMW 760 (2010) - 544hp
10.5 - Audi RS5 - 450hp
10.6 - Audi R8 (2006) - 420hp
10.6 - Cayenne Turbo (2011) - 500hp
10.8 - Porsche 993 turbo - 408hp
10.9 - BMW M3 E92 - 420hp
11.2 - Aston Vanquish S - 528hp
11.6 - Audi RS4 Avant (2012) - 450hp
10.2 - Porsche 996 GT3 - 360hp
11.0 - Audi TT RS Plus (2012) - 360hp
11.6 - Mercedes SLK-55 Black (2006) - 400hp
11.8 - Jaguar XKR (2006) - 420hp
11.8 - BMW X6 M - 555hp
11.9 - BMW X5 M - 555hp
11.9 - Ferrari F355 - 380hp
12.0 - Porsche Cayman S - 325hp
12.1 - BMW Z4 M - 343hp
13.7 - Dodge Challenger SRT-8 - 477hp
12.3 - Cayenne Turbo S (2008) - 550hp
12.4 - BMW E46 M3 - 343hp
12.5 - BMW Z3 M - 315hp
12.6 - Ford Mustang Boss 302 LS - 443hp
12.7 - Mercedes ML 63 AMG (2008) - 510hp
13.3 - Honda NSX-R - 280hp
13.3 - Audi S5 - 354hp
14.4 - BMW M135i F20 - 320hp
14.6 - BMW M3 E36 - 321hp
14.7 - Cayenne Turbo (2004) - 450hp
14.9 - Mitsubishi Evo IX - 290hp
14.9 - Mitsubishi Evo IV - 279hp
15.3 - Ford Focus RS (2009) - 305hp
15.3 - Audi TT-S - 272hp
15.7 - Nissan 370Z - 330hp
16.0 - Jeep SRT-8 - 426hp
16.2 - Renault Megane RS (2009) - 250hp
16.4 - Subaru WRX STi - 280hp
16.4 - Seat Leon Cupra R - 265hp
17.0 - Supra Turbo - 284hp
17.9 - Audi TT 3.2 (2007) - 250hp
18.0 - Mitsubishi Evo X MR - 295hp
18.0 - VW Golf GTI VII - 230hp
18.4 - Mazda 3 MPS (2009) - 260hp
20.8 - Mini Cooper S works (2004) - 200hp
21.0 - Mazda RX-8 RS - 231hp
23.0 - Honda Civic Type-R (2007) - 201hp
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2807.jpeg
    IMG_2807.jpeg
    42.8 KB · Views: 660
  • 7676976d-fbe6-43cf-81e3-8937c3c41fc5.jpeg
    7676976d-fbe6-43cf-81e3-8937c3c41fc5.jpeg
    236.2 KB · Views: 659
He looks comfy in the boot. I bet he could improve his time if he was in the driver seat. Just sayin’.
 
Marcoose said:
He looks comfy in the boot. I bet he could improve his time if he was in the driver seat. Just sayin’.
He's just ballast. So with all that power, the car can do a 'wheelie'. :D
The bootlid also doubles as an airbrake.
 
I bet it's fun to enjoy the acceleration, with all that lovely torque. :thumbsup: If it's even remotely like the ///MR aerowise though, it will try and take off above 170mph. So serious Aero may be required before you try high speed runs. :wink:
 
Pondrew said:
Marcoose said:
He looks comfy in the boot. I bet he could improve his time if he was in the driver seat. Just sayin’.
He's just ballast. So with all that power, the car can do a 'wheelie'. :D
The bootlid also doubles as an airbrake.
Now we’re cooking with gas, folks. By page 3 he’ll pick another 10 bhp.
 
B21 said:
1) Where I live there is no access to a long, flat, open wide fast road to do any performance testing..this invalidates using a GPS data logger such as Dragy to come up with some standard figures as gradients impact the numbers.

2) The 0-60 is pretty brutal on the powertrain..somewhere north of 600 bhp there's a real danger of snapping drive axles and a bit further damage to the DCT box on full on drag starts.

3) Calculations show that with the current gearing, how the engine revs out and now holds peak power that the car given room should do between 190 and 200 mph..but that needs a lot of room.

I love the mods you have done and enjoy modding myself but personally don`t want to go the turbo / supercharger route . Looking at the reasons you have given for not being able to or not wanting to test due to possible damage does it make sense in your situation to go so far with mods ?
 
1536Z4 said:
I love the mods you have done and enjoy modding myself but personally don`t want to go the turbo / supercharger route . Looking at the reasons you have given for not being able to or not wanting to test due to possible damage does it make sense in your situation to go so far with mods ?

It depends what you want I suppose. Peters' car was probably about as quick from a standing start when it "only" had about 400 bhp as traction is the limiting factor, and unless you are a road tester do you really have so little mechanical sympathy to nail your own car from a standing start anyway? I don't!

But once on the move when traction isn't such an issue it must be epic. Anyway I'll find out in October on his Scottish Coast to Coast trip, assuming I can keep him in sight now and again. :lol:
 
The only 550bhp car I've driven was a Jaguar F-Type, prepared & performance-tested for demonstration. I drove it on a public road.

It was agile, but surprisingly stable, very quick from zero and I liked it a lot.

It was not difficult, however, to imagine it being a pain in the ar$e to drive regularly.
 
Martyn said:
6.7 - Ferrari Enzo - 651hp
6.79 - Martyn's 580bhp Z4M :thumbsup:
6.8 - Ferrari GTB 599 - 612hp
TEST-000006-V-100-200KPH.jpg

Very impressive..I'l have to se if my Italian cousin wants to rise to that challenge!..I suspect he's doing about 525 at the crank..but..your ponies seem very strong! :thumbsup:
 
1536Z4 said:
B21 said:
1) Where I live there is no access to a long, flat, open wide fast road to do any performance testing..this invalidates using a GPS data logger such as Dragy to come up with some standard figures as gradients impact the numbers.

2) The 0-60 is pretty brutal on the powertrain..somewhere north of 600 bhp there's a real danger of snapping drive axles and a bit further damage to the DCT box on full on drag starts.

3) Calculations show that with the current gearing, how the engine revs out and now holds peak power that the car given room should do between 190 and 200 mph..but that needs a lot of room.

I love the mods you have done and enjoy modding myself but personally don`t want to go the turbo / supercharger route . Looking at the reasons you have given for not being able to or not wanting to test due to possible damage does it make sense in your situation to go so far with mods ?

Mr Tidy makes the relevant observations..trying to get to 60 off the line over 300 bhp is more of a function of technique and outright lack of mechanical empathy..for example if 0-60 launch time is your focus you program the gearbox to increase the % slip of the wheels before traction control intervenes..

I've never indulged in 0-60 dashes..at worst a rolling start then floor it..

On any powertrain that started life at 300 bhp aqnd you take it to 550 bhp you have to expect limitations and bottlenecks..

There's the inevitable non linear relationship between power increase, cost and reliability..even a simple re-map on the 35i/35is often results in plugs and coilks giving up..

I do know that at 550bhp I'm a long way from the huys running 700-800 bhp and even those at the 900-1000 so I take some comfort from them.

Supercharging / turbo charging a normally NA car is definitely more demanding when compared to simply uprating components on a proven fully integrated and de-bugged existing turbo'd engine..
 
B21 said:
I've never indulged in 0-60 dashes..at worst a rolling start then floor it..

Thanks for the reply [ref]B21[/ref], and the input from [ref]Mr Tidy[/ref], I have re-read your post properly this time and see that you are referring to just doing performance logging rather than using your cars performance when driving . I also do not do any ( ok many ) 0 - 60 sprints due to the reasons discussed and mainly enjoy the mid range acceleration . I think 500bhp is more than enough and don`t really get the 1000bhp plus builds that are only used for the road but then that is probably due to the fact I have never driven one and may change my mind if I did .

Is it the challenge of chasing the performance figures and the build rather than having the performance that is the drive for you ?
 
1536Z4 said:
B21 said:
I've never indulged in 0-60 dashes..at worst a rolling start then floor it..

Thanks for the reply [ref]B21[/ref], and the input from [ref]Mr Tidy[/ref], I have re-read your post properly this time and see that you are referring to just doing performance logging rather than using your cars performance when driving . I also do not do any ( ok many ) 0 - 60 sprints due to the reasons discussed and mainly enjoy the mid range acceleration . I think 500bhp is more than enough and don`t really get the 1000bhp plus builds that are only used for the road but then that is probably due to the fact I have never driven one and may change my mind if I did .

Is it the challenge of chasing the performance figures and the build rather than having the performance that is the drive for you ?

The guys on the 500 BHP-1000bhp are essentially doing it for either structured or unstructured drag racing / sprints..the reality is their engines probably couldn’t sustain those power levers for more than a few seconds without either overheating or structural failure..

When I decided to do a 35is upgrade program I bought lots of bits before I started the program…

Had I known how easy it was to get to 400 BHP on stock turbos and what 400 BHP felt like on UK roads then I would never have gone onto subsequently fitting bigger turbos…but..I’d started so I saw the program out..and if I’m doing something I like to do the best job I can with the materials / skills I have to hand..

The only remotely good news is that any overtake that could have started to look tight now never is..just press the go peddle hard and close your eyes.. :tumbleweed: :driving: :thumbsup: :rofl:
 
B21 said:
1536Z4 said:
B21 said:
I've never indulged in 0-60 dashes..at worst a rolling start then floor it..

Thanks for the reply [ref]B21[/ref], and the input from [ref]Mr Tidy[/ref], I have re-read your post properly this time and see that you are referring to just doing performance logging rather than using your cars performance when driving . I also do not do any ( ok many ) 0 - 60 sprints due to the reasons discussed and mainly enjoy the mid range acceleration . I think 500bhp is more than enough and don`t really get the 1000bhp plus builds that are only used for the road but then that is probably due to the fact I have never driven one and may change my mind if I did .

Is it the challenge of chasing the performance figures and the build rather than having the performance that is the drive for you ?

The guys on the 500 BHP-1000bhp are essentially doing it for either structured or unstructured drag racing / sprints..the reality is their engines probably couldn’t sustain those power levers for more than a few seconds without either overheating or structural failure..

When I decided to do a 35is upgrade program I bought lots of bits before I started the program…

Had I known how easy it was to get to 400 BHP on stock turbos and what 400 BHP felt like on UK roads then I would never have gone onto subsequently fitting bigger turbos…but..I’d started so I saw the program out..and if I’m doing something I like to do the best job I can with the materials / skills I have to hand..

The only remotely good news is that any overtake that could have started to look tight now never is..just press the go peddle hard and close your eyes.. :tumbleweed: :driving: :thumbsup: :rofl:

:D :driving: :thumbsup:

LoL I miss that in my Mazda Mx5. The MR could do that, just drop to 3rd gear, press the pedal and bam you where past.

oh to try and grow old gracefully and with no regrets. :wink:
 
B21 said:
Had I known how easy it was to get to 400 BHP on stock turbos and what 400 BHP felt like on UK roads then I would never have gone onto subsequently fitting bigger turbos…but..I’d started so I saw the program out..and if I’m doing something I like to do the best job I can with the materials / skills I have to hand..

Great answer :thumbsup: Nice to have all that power for safe overtaking :)
 
Back
Top Bottom