Walnut Blasting

Walnut blasting is supposedly to be suitable to blast the valve stems in situ (intake valves).
That is not something you can do with other media, except maybe dry ice.

But that only may be an issue with direct injection engines. Not something an e85 z4 has afaik, so in this context not interesting (your valve stems also must have carbon buildup obviously)
They say it also on their site I see.

Normal injected engines have an injector spraying gas on the valves all the time, and that is an excellent cleaning media.
It may be interesting for the e89 guys (n54/n20 engine)

The carbon buildup comes from the CCV (oil vapours etc), but I don't think it's that big of a deal as they are letting us believe. The carbon buildup I have seen in my own manifold (so the part prior the injectors)... I mean it is dirty, but it is not hard and crusty, so it would get wiped off by the stem seals imho. Maybe at very high mileage or engines that have run hot or so...

Or is there something else you were planning to have done/blasted?
 
Common thing to have done on the Gen 2 BMW Mini's,

BMW even offer it as a service from memory, not heard of anyone using it for a zed though.
 
hopz121 said:
Common thing to have done on the Gen 2 BMW Mini's,

BMW even offer it as a service from memory, not heard of anyone using it for a zed though.
and DS3's....

apparently, mine seems fine so far (touches wood...)
 
Mainly for direct injection engines as stated as they suffer heavily from it.

The S5 V8 is a major culprit of this.

I am in the process of arranging a hydrogen cleaning on my car with before and after dyno to show its impact.

At £90 a pop if it proves effective which I am positive it should be, it will certainly be cheaper than the £700 manual strip of engine head and scraping the carbon out

Ill let you know how it goes once we've done it all if you are really interested in a clean.
 
Disca said:
Mainly for direct injection engines as stated as they suffer heavily from it.

On the other hand how much do they suffer?
I mean, it is a system which is popular since direct injection engines.
But diesels have been direct injection since.....forever. And no diesel engine suffers from this. Hell, diesels even have exhaust gas recircualtion and that only seems to be effecting the erg valve itself, not the cylinderhead valves.

So I wonder how much of the walnut blasting is created by necessity and how much by marketing.
 
If you have an E86 you've got the N52 engine assuming it isn't an M, which doesn't have Direct Injection (unlike the later N53).

So like me no need to have walnuts blasted! :rofl: Phew.
 
GuidoK said:
Disca said:
Mainly for direct injection engines as stated as they suffer heavily from it.

On the other hand how much do they suffer?
I mean, it is a system which is popular since direct injection engines.
But diesels have been direct injection since.....forever. And no diesel engine suffers from this. Hell, diesels even have exhaust gas recircualtion and that only seems to be effecting the erg valve itself, not the cylinderhead valves.

So I wonder how much of the walnut blasting is created by necessity and how much by marketing.

No clue where your information comes from but it certainly will affect diesels.

It is a common topic on the owners clubs of cars affected ie the S5 and RS4.
 
Mr Tidy said:
If you have an E86 you've got the N52 engine assuming it isn't an M, which doesn't have Direct Injection (unlike the later N53).

So like me no need to have walnuts blasted! :rofl: Phew.

Painful :dizzy:
 
Disca said:
No clue where your information comes from but it certainly will affect diesels.

My clues and information comes from that I drive diesels sometimes up to 40k miles/year and drive them up to 300k miles without problems.
And so have many others for decades and decades. Carbon buildup has never been a real issue with these cars, not on the valves; only the egr valve sometimes does have issues if you don't floor your car once in a while... It's an elderly problem :lol:
If it's dirty it's still no problem. If you cleant it, it will be dirty again after 2k miles because of the oil from the ccv.
When it becomes really flow restricting, or very hard crud that restricts valvemovement, then it's a problem

It's like you see with a lot of products. As soon as they hit the market, it's suddenly an issue and everybody has that issue.
Mostly the peolple who do not take up the spanners themselves and have a guy for everything. Those people don't know what's normal and not normal in an engine. They are ignorant.
And the marketing of these products knows how to use that situation.

And my clue comes from that I sometimes remove an inlet manifold and swipe my finger over stuff.
Not from Aldi's though... everybody knows they're crap... :poke:

Anyway any engine that pollutes itself so much that every 30k miles the complete inlet manifold has to come off for walnut blasting (yes, that is what that garage wants us to believe, every 30.000 miles, without reservation!) is a really crappy engine in my book.
 
Below is a copy and paste of my write-up on the A5OC forums to the carbon clean I had done this morning. I am very impressed with the figures for a £99 clean. Not sure how impacted the Z4s are as mentioned before but thought I would follow up and at least post my findings. The clean was done by http://www.enginecarbonclean.com/ with the technical director for the company and a franchisee doing the actual clean.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Throughout the entire process the car did not move today. It was strapped down to the dyno for the before run, then cleaned on the dyno and then had the after run. This meant no variance due to changing the strap tension or anything like that. Room was temperature controlled also.

Before run:
IMAG0388_zpskpinjgni.jpg

Apparently these cars never hit the figures they say they can! Excuse the picture but my phone didn't like capturing the screen as per usual.

After the run we did the clean:
IMAG0389_zpsfmbm3tlf.jpg

As can be seen in the image, the car did not move off the dyno :)

After the clean we did the second run, short clip of it below.

Facebook has better compression it seems so this may sound clearer:
https://www.facebook.com/mike.askew.568/videos/10153752489843343/?l=6131842321713812080

and here we are with the final figures:
IMAG0392_zpsyuf0xpp0.jpg


+21bhp
+20ft-lb across the range
Engine is significantly quieter as other mentioned but still sounds epic under load
The pull is alot smoother across the whole range whereas before it pulled noticeably harder after 3k revs
 
Back
Top Bottom