sars said:That poster is slightly flawed and is also misleading, because nothing is that simplistic, tyre wear is not necessarily higher than an IC vehicle and brake wear is actually lower. The CO2 difference is in the manufacturing of the battery, and whilst significant think about where we also use batteries! The one thing that is correct, the rare metals used in batteries are conflict materials. What it doesn’t include is the potential to recycle batteries, another potential industry in itself.
If you want to travel far greenly, you’ll have to wait until Hydrogen become readily available, produced by photovoltaic energy
Not according to Kardashev, we are only limited by what we are willing to do, there is enough energy available to harness from our star, 2 x 10^17 Watts, which at present levels is about 4000 times more than we use now, Hydrogen is a great way of storing this energy, we just need to collect it.smorris_12 said:We cannot have this level of civilisation without that level of untenable consumption.
Unsure on the poster Sars, thats the problem, you don't know what to believe and whether EVs are as green as made out to be.
Of course we're OK now as we have an abundance of north sea oil and gas :lol:
Tim.