Busterboo said:I don't know and I believe you know more than me about E89s' alignment stability, anyway. My comment relates to roads rather than the E89.mr wilks said:Why would you expect that :? E89s are not known for poor tracking or alignment issues are they ?![]()
I'm lucky enough to live near a tyre dealer with a Hunter, who charges for the work he actually does. So, instead of having a fixed fee for front or full alignment, he does a diagnostic, shows you the printout and says, 'That'll cost you x' or 'Go away. It's OK'.
Living in a town where the potholes are so big they have echoes, I go to see him when I hit a nasty one and every 3 or 4 months even if I think I've managed to avoid 'em all.
The shortest interval between nasties was 17 days. The longest with none was 4 months, but even then the settings had wandered far enough for him to reset one of the fronts. (I keep all the printouts, of course.)
So, I just regard alignment as a running cost.
I don't disagree that at times a alignment is required but i also believe that if a Z is running straight + true don't go looking for problems