Turkey & Russia

lux said:
Taz said:
i think i heard it say the russian jet was in turkish air space for 17 seconds :thumbsdown: not sure that really warrants the action

That's like saying "that wasn't really anal, only the tip slipped in".....still bum love in my book!

well i'd sacrifice my bum for world peace lol
 
Trucks burning on the Turkey/Syria border after air strikes.
http://mobile.reuters.com/video/2015/11/25/footage-shows-trucks-burning-at-turkey-s?videoId=366455604&utm_source=twitter

Your move Turkey
 
Nictrix said:
Although I dont agree that Turkey was in the right to shoot down ANY plane nomatter whos it was I think they were definately in the wrong to blow up the helicopter that went in to try and rescue the downed pilots.
That is of course if the news that we are fed is to be believed.

Don't think Turkey blew up the helicopter, that came from Syria.

Another question is what would the Russians do if somebody invaded their airspace on a repeated basis?
 
Its why I said if the news can be believed.
The news basically said the helicopter was taken out by Turkish rebels.
 
Mmmm, aswell as over-reacting it appears Turkey is also hypocritical.

"Even if Turkey’s version of what happened on Tuesday is true, the response to alleged violation by Russia appears to be disproportionate and contradicting Ankara’s own position. In 2012, Turkey lost an F-3 Phantom warplane to a Syrian attack after it strayed into Syrian territory.

“A short-term border violation can never be a pretext for an attack,” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who was then-Turkish prime minister, told BBC at the time as he expressed rage over the downing of the plane.

Turkey has prior form in terms of violating other nations’ airspace. In 2005, Turkey entered Greek airspace 1,017 times, or as often as 40 times a day, according to a WikiLeaks document.
 
Difficult situation.

What if this was a Russian bomber flying over eastern Scotland?

Our QRA typhoons would be there alongside it and providing the same warnings/missiles should it not heed.

Equally, military flights are not some haphazard 'oh lets go bomb some buildings', they're planned calculated and very specific. The decision to cross into Turkey (or at least - 'what happens if we're near the border') will have been made long before takeoff, and if this was an in-flight planned mission the pilot will have concisouly said 'it's ok to cross turkey'. Equally radar and maps on these jets are pretty fking accurate. The Su-24 granted, is old, and more likely to have been wrong (i think the Turkish F16's will presumably use some reasonably recent US avionics) but really - there wont of been any question of where they were, and both pilots understand the consequences of crossing borders you're not allowed to.

Why don't the Russians have policy of not putting themselves in this situation? They have a responsibility to their own pilots to enforce this.

If Turkey doesn't shoot after 17 seconds in their territory, when IS acceptable? It's a border for a reason, that's the red line. In that time they're probably travelling 2-3 miles, if not more in their supersonic nuclear bombers (Scotland..). Supersonic bombers nearer their top speed will do 24 miles in 60 seconds.
 
Back
Top Bottom