Hi guys
Just wondered what people would think of purchasing
a second hand F-type coupe, 340ps. Prices seem to be heading close to £30k for a four year old one with relatively low miles. To me it seems like a lot of car for the money also considering it would be a main dealer car with a two year warranty.
I know it’s not the “S” which is probably the one to get, but that’s at least another £5k and will definitely be out of my range. Would the standard F-type still feel special enough to drive, without having an LSD and most likely without adaptive dampers to go along with what I think are totally stunning looks?
Other cars I am looking at are the 140 and 240 but they would be new. Also at a similar price bracket but not so much on my radar is the Cayman 981 2.7, again 4 years old. Whilst I’m sure the cCayman could run rings around the F-type in the right hands, I don’t think it would be as good an everyday car like the F-type, it’s also slower with less power and I don’t think it sounds as good.
I know the 140 and 240 are very different cars to the F-type and even faster still, but the of F-type coupe, even in 340 guise is pulling me in like a moth to a fluorescent light.
So, would I be absolutely mad to? What would be the downsides to the F-type? How much could an F-type go down in value? Could a £33k F-type depreciate as much as a 140 at the same price over three or four years? It’s going to be financed so I know all my questions will have many variables.
I’m comparing apples with oranges but what else is there to compare with the F-type for the money?
Cheers!
Just wondered what people would think of purchasing
a second hand F-type coupe, 340ps. Prices seem to be heading close to £30k for a four year old one with relatively low miles. To me it seems like a lot of car for the money also considering it would be a main dealer car with a two year warranty.
I know it’s not the “S” which is probably the one to get, but that’s at least another £5k and will definitely be out of my range. Would the standard F-type still feel special enough to drive, without having an LSD and most likely without adaptive dampers to go along with what I think are totally stunning looks?
Other cars I am looking at are the 140 and 240 but they would be new. Also at a similar price bracket but not so much on my radar is the Cayman 981 2.7, again 4 years old. Whilst I’m sure the cCayman could run rings around the F-type in the right hands, I don’t think it would be as good an everyday car like the F-type, it’s also slower with less power and I don’t think it sounds as good.
I know the 140 and 240 are very different cars to the F-type and even faster still, but the of F-type coupe, even in 340 guise is pulling me in like a moth to a fluorescent light.
So, would I be absolutely mad to? What would be the downsides to the F-type? How much could an F-type go down in value? Could a £33k F-type depreciate as much as a 140 at the same price over three or four years? It’s going to be financed so I know all my questions will have many variables.
I’m comparing apples with oranges but what else is there to compare with the F-type for the money?
Cheers!