Yes and I believe mine was £68k new before any options, although they do come pretty well specced as standard in fairness.mr wilks said:LeeZ4MR said:I remember paying £32k for a 2012 model(M sport) back in 2014 and I thought that it was a lot of car for the money even then. They are cracking value now for sure and they offer a brilliant performance/economy mix. I put 70k miles on it in just under 3 years and it was a great car, it returned 40mpg as well which I thought was great for the performance.mr wilks said:Seems like a good thread to discuss the current state of affairs across the marques , it really is a eye opener when you start scanning the classifieds .
How about a later shape 6 series for the price of a same year 2.0 E89https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201907039685708?onesearchad=Used&onesearchad=Nearly%20New&onesearchad=New&price-from=11000&postcode=bb120hr&sort=price-asc&price-to=20000&radius=1500&advertising-location=at_cars&model=6%20SERIES&make=BMW&page=1
![]()
Granted that is a Se but there are Msport models for not much more , would these not have been more than a M4 at original list price ?
DSCOFF said:So as the owner of a higher mileage car - I’m not feeling the love!
Not all higher mileage cars are ‘tat’ and not claiming my own 118K car to be a mint example.
Wear items like the driver’s seat bolster seem to show relatively early signs of wear - especially if you are big or tall.
The matt finish on my steering wheel has some wear.
Externally: I have the usual foglight issues, naturally some stone chips and the odd mark or two.
All of which I’ve seen on far lower mileage cars.
But does that make it ‘tat’?
I am shortly selling my own car and planned to offer it on the forum, before elsewhere. But now feeling paranoid!
She’s going to BMW for a service this month. Perhaps I’ll ask about the scrappage scheme?
![]()
mr wilks said:DSCOFF said:So as the owner of a higher mileage car - I’m not feeling the love!
Not all higher mileage cars are ‘tat’ and not claiming my own 118K car to be a mint example.
Wear items like the driver’s seat bolster seem to show relatively early signs of wear - especially if you are big or tall.
The matt finish on my steering wheel has some wear.
Externally: I have the usual foglight issues, naturally some stone chips and the odd mark or two.
All of which I’ve seen on far lower mileage cars.
But does that make it ‘tat’?
I am shortly selling my own car and planned to offer it on the forum, before elsewhere. But now feeling paranoid!
She’s going to BMW for a service this month. Perhaps I’ll ask about the scrappage scheme?
![]()
Totally with you as i suspect will many other forum members so don't be put off listing it on here .
Ive had enough cars (not just Zs) to know that low mileage does not always make a mint car , often its far from it , one of the best condition Zs i had of the 14 was a 123k 23i E89 .
With a car that is 12/13 years old , will have had 2-3-4 ++ owners then its common sense to buy it on current condition , history , how it drives , no of owners & lastly for me is the colour + spec
DSCOFF said:So as the owner of a higher mileage car - I’m not feeling the love!
Not all higher mileage cars are ‘tat’ and not claiming my own 118K car to be a mint example.
Wear items like the driver’s seat bolster seem to show relatively early signs of wear - especially if you are big or tall.
The matt finish on my steering wheel has some wear.
Externally: I have the usual foglight issues, naturally some stone chips and the odd mark or two.
All of which I’ve seen on far lower mileage cars.
But does that make it ‘tat’?
I am shortly selling my own car and planned to offer it on the forum, before elsewhere. But now feeling paranoid!
She’s going to BMW for a service this month. Perhaps I’ll ask about the scrappage scheme?
DSCOFF said:So as the owner of a higher mileage car - I’m not feeling the love!
Not all higher mileage cars are ‘tat’ and not claiming my own 118K car to be a mint example.
Wear items like the driver’s seat bolster seem to show relatively early signs of wear - especially if you are big or tall.
The matt finish on my steering wheel has some wear.
Externally: I have the usual foglight issues, naturally some stone chips and the odd mark or two.
All of which I’ve seen on far lower mileage cars.
But does that make it ‘tat’?
I am shortly selling my own car and planned to offer it on the forum, before elsewhere. But now feeling paranoid!
She’s going to BMW for a service this month. Perhaps I’ll ask about the scrappage scheme?
![]()
earthdweller said:DSCOFF said:So as the owner of a higher mileage car - I’m not feeling the love!
Not all higher mileage cars are ‘tat’ and not claiming my own 118K car to be a mint example.
Wear items like the driver’s seat bolster seem to show relatively early signs of wear - especially if you are big or tall.
The matt finish on my steering wheel has some wear.
Externally: I have the usual foglight issues, naturally some stone chips and the odd mark or two.
All of which I’ve seen on far lower mileage cars.
But does that make it ‘tat’?
I am shortly selling my own car and planned to offer it on the forum, before elsewhere. But now feeling paranoid!
She’s going to BMW for a service this month. Perhaps I’ll ask about the scrappage scheme?
![]()
I wasn’t having a go at your car .. of course you can have a nice well maintained high mileage car
The point I was making is that the Zeds are now in the price point where they are within the reach of a “certain demographic”
Lots are being modded .. stripped .. abused .. broken .. etc
You only have to look on some of the fb groups to see what happening to a lot of the cars
Once they have gone as they surely will only the straight well looked after cars will be left .. and at that point prices will firm and maybe rise