sharkman07 said:After trawling through pages and pages I'm still confused as to what the price is.. can the OP post it clearly please?
Oops ignore that, you beat me by 10 seconds.
sharkman07 said:After trawling through pages and pages I'm still confused as to what the price is.. can the OP post it clearly please?
sharkman07 said:After trawling through pages and pages I'm still confused as to what the price is.. can the OP post it clearly please?

original guvnor said:Every once in a while we get for sale threads that create a lot of heated debate. This one is just the latest. You'll never see mine for sale on here when the time comes for a change, that's for sure![]()
mr wilks said:original guvnor said:Every once in a while we get for sale threads that create a lot of heated debate. This one is just the latest. You'll never see mine for sale on here when the time comes for a change, that's for sure![]()
Heehee , will it be WBAC, trade in or Ebay![]()
At least you get a more enthusiastic class of to$$er on here![]()
Shame is if that car had appeared at a few meets , had post after post of heritage on here then 99% of folks would have waltzed along happy to the tune :wink:
What I see is a decent "looking" M with low miles at a fair price , anything else written is pure speculation until viewed but i still feel the ask doesn't allow for the Cat D status enough to prompt a viewing .
jmo though so no offence intended Ross
mr wilks said:original guvnor said:Every once in a while we get for sale threads that create a lot of heated debate. This one is just the latest. You'll never see mine for sale on here when the time comes for a change, that's for sure![]()
Heehee , will it be WBAC, trade in or Ebay![]()
At least you get a more enthusiastic class of to$$er on here![]()
Shame is if that car had appeared at a few meets , had post after post of heritage on here then 99% of folks would have waltzed along happy to the tune :wink:
What I see is a decent "looking" M with low miles at a fair price , anything else written is pure speculation until viewed but i still feel the ask doesn't allow for the Cat D status enough to prompt a viewing .
jmo though so no offence intended Ross
mr wilks said:Heehee , will it be WBAC, trade in or Ebay![]()
At least you get a more enthusiastic class of to$$er on here![]()
mr wilks said:its like playing footy with a ball covered in dog$hiteveryones keen but who really wants the next kick :wink:
Ewazix said:Genuine well done Ross, the ad is now as it should be, up-front, factual and informative. You now have a better chance of getting fair value and a buyer of being in an informed position buy confidently 8)
wsmdesign said:Ewazix said:Genuine well done Ross, the ad is now as it should be, up-front, factual and informative. You now have a better chance of getting fair value and a buyer of being in an informed position buy confidently 8)
Ross - you now have the approval of the "editor in chief" and the person whom clearly feels has the definitive right to say so. I find it quite offensive that someone feels that their endorsement "the ad is now as it should be" (in their opinion) makes everything OK.
I am a relatively new member and having read this entire thread it concerns me the inconsistencies in people's interpretation of facts. That said I do find the majority of dialogue on the site absolutely fantastic and people are genuinely helpful - it's because of that I am looking forward to being a member.
I am not trying to be confrontational Ewazix and I am mindful that you are a very experienced member of the site and I'll happily apologise now if I've offended you. I just want to state for the record that as a potential buyer I was never misled by the advert and Ross has been more than a gentleman to re-write the advert - a sign of his integrity and genuineness. No doubt potential buyers will have enough information to make an informed conclusion and carry out their own checks.
......and relax........
wsmdesign said:Ewazix said:Genuine well done Ross, the ad is now as it should be, up-front, factual and informative. You now have a better chance of getting fair value and a buyer of being in an informed position buy confidently 8)
Ross - you now have the approval of the "editor in chief" and the person whom clearly feels has the definitive right to say so. I find it quite offensive that someone feels that their endorsement "the ad is now as it should be" (in their opinion) makes everything OK.
I am a relatively new member and having read this entire thread it concerns me the inconsistencies in people's interpretation of facts. That said I do find the majority of dialogue on the site absolutely fantastic and people are genuinely helpful - it's because of that I am looking forward to being a member.
I am not trying to be confrontational Ewazix and I am mindful that you are a very experienced member of the site and I'll happily apologise now if I've offended you. I just want to state for the record that as a potential buyer I was never misled by the advert and Ross has been more than a gentleman to re-write the advert - a sign of his integrity and genuineness. No doubt potential buyers will have enough information to make an informed conclusion and carry out their own checks.
......and relax........