Rufford Ford again

TitanTim said:
Some of the cars that come to grief are only a few years old if that so must be worth 20k plus, I would have thought a car filled with water etc would be written off so don't these people realise its unlkely their insurance would cover it, kinda crazy when completely unnavoidable.

Tim.

Fresh water shouldn't cause it to be written off (unless ingested) unless the waters full of silt etc. Let it dry out, a thorough detail, and should be good to go. But yeah, complete stupidity.
 
rdgreen said:
TitanTim said:
Some of the cars that come to grief are only a few years old if that so must be worth 20k plus, I would have thought a car filled with water etc would be written off so don't these people realise its unlkely their insurance would cover it, kinda crazy when completely unnavoidable.

Tim.

Fresh water shouldn't cause it to be written off (unless ingested) unless the waters full of silt etc. Let it dry out, a thorough detail, and should be good to go. But yeah, complete stupidity.

I don't think that's fresh water :? it was filthy.

Tim.
 
Pondrew said:
TitanTim said:
Some of the cars that come to grief are only a few years old if that so must be worth 20k plus, I would have thought a car filled with water etc would be written off so don't these people realise its unlkely their insurance would cover it, kinda crazy when completely unnavoidable.
Insurance won't pay out in that scenario. I know someone who drove their Mitsubishi L200 through a big puddle; water got into the air intake, smashed the turbo to pieces and blew his engine. Insurance refused liability as it was 'avoidable' and 'reckless'. Cost him £11k and struggled to get insurance afterwards. TBH it was his own fault, same as muppets who try and drive through 2ft of water.
It must depend on what you tell the insurer, a friend killed his S5 about 3 years ago driving it through a flood that never ended.
Was paid out in days and was in his new car in just over a week.
He had his drone in the boot and he put it up in the air while his car was in the flood, all you could see for hundreds of metres around him was water. He was never going to make it out.
 
Nictrix said:
Pondrew said:
TitanTim said:
Some of the cars that come to grief are only a few years old if that so must be worth 20k plus, I would have thought a car filled with water etc would be written off so don't these people realise its unlkely their insurance would cover it, kinda crazy when completely unnavoidable.
Insurance won't pay out in that scenario. I know someone who drove their Mitsubishi L200 through a big puddle; water got into the air intake, smashed the turbo to pieces and blew his engine. Insurance refused liability as it was 'avoidable' and 'reckless'. Cost him £11k and struggled to get insurance afterwards. TBH it was his own fault, same as muppets who try and drive through 2ft of water.
It must depend on what you tell the insurer, a friend killed his S5 about 3 years ago driving it through a flood that never ended.
Was paid out in days and was in his new car in just over a week.
He had his drone in the boot and he put it up in the air while his car was in the flood, all you could see for hundreds of metres around him was water. He was never going to make it out.

So why did he drive into it in the first place?
 
Scubaregs said:
Nictrix said:
Pondrew said:
Insurance won't pay out in that scenario. I know someone who drove their Mitsubishi L200 through a big puddle; water got into the air intake, smashed the turbo to pieces and blew his engine. Insurance refused liability as it was 'avoidable' and 'reckless'. Cost him £11k and struggled to get insurance afterwards. TBH it was his own fault, same as muppets who try and drive through 2ft of water.
It must depend on what you tell the insurer, a friend killed his S5 about 3 years ago driving it through a flood that never ended.
Was paid out in days and was in his new car in just over a week.
He had his drone in the boot and he put it up in the air while his car was in the flood, all you could see for hundreds of metres around him was water. He was never going to make it out.

So why did he drive into it in the first place?
On his way to work very early one morning in the rain and dark on a not familiar road. Came across a bit of water on the road and didnt think it would be deep or last long. Once he was in so far there was no going back.
If it had been slightly later there would have been road closed signs up to warn people.
 
I see the Police have been lying in wait recently going after people driving too fast.

https://youtu.be/JbPSGxfG1ek

Must have been their day off.

I can see this ending badly somehow :cry:

Tim.
 
MikeyH said:
They really are a much of pricks :headbang:

There was someone in a Discovery a few days back who aquaplaned just as they were coming out of the water and nearly lost it completely, really lucky they didn't hit the parked cars and worse take a few people out in the process. Obviously its acting up for the cameras but it appears to me to be getting a bit dangerous now :cry:

Tim.
 
What offence would they be charged with though? I doubt they are breaking the speed limit and "not being in proper control of a vehicle" would probably also not stick.
 
pvr said:
What offence would they be charged with though? I doubt they are breaking the speed limit and "not being in proper control of a vehicle" would probably also not stick.
Dangerous driving, undue care and attention, anti-social behaviour.....the cops have a list as long as your arm if they so want to use them.
 
There's a couple of past videos of the police parked up in the entrance to the property next to the Ford and as soon as someone has gone through at even moderate speeds the blue lights of come on and they've pulled the driver up down the road.

I guess it will be a warning to keep the speed down according to the conditions. Someone flooring it through there it's only a matter of time. There seems to be alot of young kids that the parents bring along for a bit of fun watching people come to grief but it seems to have turned into who can drive through there the fastest. Not really a good idea.

Tim.
 
There is a ford on the river Wear in Stanhope (Co Durham) that has been closed to traffic because of the chumps going through when the river is flowing faster / deeper than normal.

One of the worst abuses of common sense is the crossing on Holy Island - that beggars belief ! There are signs that say “when the water reaches here - Do Not Cross”. Yet they do!
 
Pondrew said:
pvr said:
What offence would they be charged with though? I doubt they are breaking the speed limit and "not being in proper control of a vehicle" would probably also not stick.
Dangerous driving, undue care and attention, anti-social behaviour.....the cops have a list as long as your arm if they so want to use them.
All they have to do is say its a protest against oil and the Police wouldn't do anything :x
 
That is some surface tension 😄

In my old schooldays I would have been able to calculate the required speed based on weight and pressure surface but that is beyond me now
 
Back
Top Bottom