Ready for Bond , James Bond ?

Nice looking watch.

There not my thing really as I can't wear one at work so am not in the habit of wearing a watch anymore.

Have seen quite a lot of watches on this forum though and have been thinking of getting one for best! Haven't decided yet as it would probably live in a drawer!
 
ranski said:
Not seen Spectre, as the Bourne films ruined any interest in Bond for me.

I hear there is a new Bourne film coming out next year - http://deadline.com/2015/09/matt-damon-bourne-1201518360

Have you read the books ranski?
 
sars said:
ranski said:
Not seen Spectre, as the Bourne films ruined any interest in Bond for me.

I hear there is a new Bourne film coming out next year - http://deadline.com/2015/09/matt-damon-bourne-1201518360

Have you read the books ranski?

I was on holiday a few years ago where I read jaws and ludlands Bourne identity, but found it very slow and not particularly gripping. Very much as jaws and the many other film adaptations the two were very different from the films. For bourne I much preferred the film.

Did you read all his books, how did you find them?
 
I read all the books - enjoyed them actually, read them probably 20 years ago.
 
Saw it tonight. I wasn't that impressed TBH :(

Bit slow, a somewhat piece-meal plot and too much harking back for my liking.
 
ranski said:
sars said:
ranski said:
Not seen Spectre, as the Bourne films ruined any interest in Bond for me.

I hear there is a new Bourne film coming out next year - http://deadline.com/2015/09/matt-damon-bourne-1201518360

Have you read the books ranski?

I was on holiday a few years ago where I read jaws and ludlands Bourne identity, but found it very slow and not particularly gripping. Very much as jaws and the many other film adaptations the two were very different from the films. For bourne I much preferred the film.

Did you read all his books, how did you find them?

I both enjoyed the books and the film, the first film is similar to the book, but from book two the films are completely different, with the titles about the only thing they have in common. In a way this is okay, though I prefer the story and character in the books, certainly worth reading.


Bing said:
Saw it tonight. I wasn't that impressed TBH :(

Bit slow, a somewhat piece-meal plot and too much harking back for my liking.

I too went to see it last night, I liked it :thumbsup: Was long though and the action was separated by long stretches of story
 
Well just back from Bond and must say was a bit disappointed. Casino and Skyfall had a decent plot whereas this was more about the locations / stunts. Very much a hark back to the weaker pre Craig Bond films.

Watchable though but was hoping for more.
 
Just got back from seeing it. I thought it was good - not the strongest story line but good action scenes.
 
ranski said:
buzyg said:
ranski said:
Not seen Spectre, as the Bourne films ruined any interest in Bond for me.

Why? :?

Personal taste?

Casino Royal was a new lease of life for the Bond franchise, well when looking back to the previous 90's releases. Bourne Identity was a game changer when it was released with Eon the first to take note. However I feel the Bond franchise is back to churning out films with its dated and predictable format, a megalomaniac bent on world domination, a bond girl who in most cases dies, technology that doesn't exist nor could the MI5 afford, saying that there only appears to be a handful of people on the payroll

I think Bourne is more realistic in its story line and plot, as well as a more likeable character.

+1 on this. Had great hopes for the Craig era of Bond films, but they seem to be sliding back to the Moore/Brosnan style. I've never walked out of a film in my life, but came very close to it with Die Another Day and the invisible Aston Vanquish... I'm surprised Pierce Brosnan didn't die of embarrassment having to act through that pile of steaming crap.

Unfortunately I think EON are wedded to the film version of Bond rather than book version - despite their statements that they wanted to get back to the original characterisation of Bond. I've been ploughing through the original Fleming novels and they are a long way from the 70's/80's/90's depiction of Bond - hardly any gadgets to speak of and characters such as Q or Moneypenny barely feature. Interesting reading them back to back as you can sense that Fleming was losing his way with the stories a little, but Bond remains a pretty gritty character throughout, certainly nothing like the slightly camp, throwaway line kind of character that EON choose to portray.

I prefer the character to have at least a foothold in reality, hence why I find myself preferring the Bourne films...

Having said all that, I'll still suspend disbelief for a couple of hours and go watch Spectre anyway!
 
For those in Edinburgh the Aston martin dealership might be visiting in the next 24 hours or so .....
Both the DB5 and DB10 in the showroom

https://www.facebook.com/gtscotland/?fref=nf
 
Steph and I went to see Spectre this morning - she enjoyed I was disappointed.

Seems the franchise aren't sure where to take it. . . . have to say I'm understanding Craig's reluctance to do it all again. I'm now looking forward to a new Bond and a new approach. :(

SPOILER ALERT IF YOU'VE NOT SEEN IT YET _ DON'T READ ON

Cards on the table - I'm just a big kid and so when I go to a Bond Movie I'm expecting it to surprise me, delight me and be fun, as well as exciting, so I do like the gadgets and new ideas showcased. (There's plenty of varied spy stuff on film which offers possibly a more realistic image of the genre - so for me Bond is all about escapist excitement).

I felt let down with the new Aston - a couple of tape labelled switches and flames out the back . . .then something seen in many other films - he saves the day ejecting from the car . . . .yawn. Even the filming of the car was boring - rear shots looking down and rear shots in the chase - why no set piece iconic images?

Thought the chase scene between the two cars was very poor as well (the French do do a better job of this) though the bad guy's car looked interesting - was it a Jag 220?

A torture scene which was far too clinical and without tension (and with little after effect - eh? :cry: ) The exploding watch (yawn) The plane and off road chase (already seen that in adverts and released sections of the film - wish they'd stop doing that!) dependent upon so much timing and set pieces it was disappointing rather than enjoyable.

Back to a previous named Bond Bad Guy - even with the white cat - ok - but again, where do the producers want to go . . . .thought we were in a new age?
Couldn't believe they were still using images of women in the title sequence (good job Daniel was there with his shirt off - maybe that's meant to even things up a bit?) Bond girls - Romancing (not quite the right word more like a case of date rape) of the elderly Bond Girl spinster - why? Trying to show a side to Bond then softening up with a failed romance with the key Bond Girl. . .geez what's this supposed to show . . . .I preferred the stronger character of Jinx played by Haley Berry or Onatop (at least that's a bit of progress :thumbsup: )

I could go on - so many links and pointers to the old Bond when I thought they'd blown that away with the total destruction of the DB5. . . but no there it was again and all a bit desperate to use it at the end of the film . . . .

Quite liked the opening scene right up to the casual walk along the top of the buildings and the explosion of the building but the helicopter scene just didn't add enough drama or excitement bar it involving lots of extras - for a Bond opening it was another let down.

So a confused film for me - thought the franchise was trying to move forward but couldn't see it and neither was there enough novelty to keep me entertained. 6 out if 10. . . . .

I'm off to watch Pierce drive that tank again . . . . :lol:
 
Pretty much sums it up for me exactly Paul - though don't you dare have a go at Monica Belluci, poster girl of my youth :D
 
Lovely woman Bing though some of those women have aged better than others (she says the same about me :lol: )
 
Hmmmmm watched it yesterday at Waterloo...

The scene with Monica was a rushed affair (excuse the pun) - there was absolutely no sex appeal in it - she was good - he was lets get this over and done with.

The scene with the car? Well - i expected much much more - it was obvious that both were priceless cars and no serious racing was done - the scene in the first Craig-Bond with the Aston and the Alfa 156s was so much better - even the second one on Algeria (or Morocco).

Gizmos - where were they???

PLot line? Non existent - they lost the plot.

Whats this about brotherly love. Looks like the plot was rushed - the secret facility in the middle of the desert. Come on......

I still liked watching it - its Bond after all - however the first 2 were so much better - the operas, the poker in Casino Royale, the lovely Bond girls - this one looked like the girl next door - everything really sucked.
 
Finally seen the film tonight :) helicopters , bombs, boats ,planes , cars , totty & some tech
£8 a piece for 2 + half hours entertainment worked for myself & mrs w
Casino Royale my favourite DC Bond but enjoyed it all the same
Just has to be cinema viewed though , DvD would'nt be the same

& contrary to Shawna 8) i thought the bond lady looked absolutely swell

2DC4446100000578-3288852-image-a-15_1445796507645.jpg
 
To be fair Mr Wilks i found a nice pic of the new bond girl which drew my attention away from her plain face that made me warm up to her a bit more.......................................
 
My turn for this in the IMAX tonight. Seat reservations looked pretty empty which is great as I can not stand crowds ....
 
pvr said:
My turn for this in the IMAX tonight. Seat reservations looked pretty empty which is great as I can not stand crowds ....

Same here , the Red cinema inside the Lowry is my chosen cinema venue for that very reason , never more than a handful of folks & very comfortable
Enjoy the movie :)
 
Back
Top Bottom