Montjeu said:
You feel what budfox wrote is hurtful. Really?
There's no point in telling Carol that she is right to feel angry and agree it was all the lady's fault and her son was an innocent victim of the situation. It might be what she wanted to hear, I don't know, but it isn't true (given the outline of events).
I personally don't think that it would be good in the long run for her son to think that he shared none of the responsibility for the smack. More a lesson that he can walk away from relatively unscathed (fortunately). Just my opinion for what it is worth. I obviously don't know Carol's son or how he feels about the incident himself.
I wasn't actually asking anyone to tell me I was right about anything. I was just ranting about the situation which, inevitably is going to cost money (it has).
Sars is bang on. People become all holier than thou on these type of threads, like they've never been in a near miss, ever. Sars is right, they're lying if they say otherwise.
They also take it on themselves as judge & jury on a situation they didn't witness and in effect disagree with ALL parties who were actually there!
That's all ok, it's a forum and people will voice their different opinions, doesn't mean they are right does it? Likewise it doesnt mean my opinion is right either.
The difference between OG and others is how the opinion is put across.
And if you know OG, he doesn't do 'soft soaping'.
We drove passed the place where it happened today and there were about 4 different skid marks on the road. Some veering over to the other side. Clearly it's a dangerous black spot.
My son doesn't think he's totally blameless (he braked hard as soon as the cars came into view) but given the hill, bend and last minute decision by someone to slam their anchors on he feels that whoever came next would've hit the car in front, as do the other people involved.
(Sorry Titan

)