bluestreak56 said:It is cheap, certainly worth less than my 3.0 auto.. but for good reason!
...Are you sure?
http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/bmw/z4-coupe/bmw-z4-si-sport-coupe/948103
bluestreak56 said:It is cheap, certainly worth less than my 3.0 auto.. but for good reason!
bakes100 said:bluestreak56 said:It is cheap, certainly worth less than my 3.0 auto.. but for good reason!
...Are you sure?
http://classifieds.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/bmw/z4-coupe/bmw-z4-si-sport-coupe/948103
Darren M said:The sat nav look I thought look horrible in the Z4
flimper said:
CornishRob said:Maybe a 38 year old porn star!
Might not be as desirable, but would still go like a steam train and have a fair amount of life in her yet!

CornishRob said:Half way through its life??? It's unusual when any modern cars engine wears out! I bet am S54 would go to 300k + easily if services correctly!
It's just people get worried about miles!! Not sure why.
Woody said:Wow that is a good deal then, easily the cheapest M Coupe on the market and a well loved example by the sounds of it. Spec wouldn't be a problem for me. I hardly use the Nav or Bluetooth, although I suppose it's useful to have now and then. Heated seats are nice but again not necessary...It's all about that engine and the awesome looks which this one has. And the mileage really isn't an issue, as long as its got a FSH and well looked after its barely halfway through its life. An absolute bargain for someone...
RubyBlueZ4MC said:CornishRob said:Maybe a 38 year old porn star!
Might not be as desirable, but would still go like a steam train and have a fair amount of life in her yet!
Couldn't that make her more desirable than a younger model with less "steam"??![]()
Glad you clarified, your post makes a lot of sense. I was looking through the old posts from when you picked it upDarren M said:Guys the Coupe at Ocean is my old car...