On the ? day of Christmas my Gov gave to me

craig3.2 said:
ronk said:
However Implying someone is a Nazi is not!

Yes,Ron,
Because Wullie said it,so it's okay.

Don't you know by now Ron,
Wullie can say what he wants,and that's all right,
But God help the rest of us if we disagree with that.
(His usual response is Personal attacks,Insults,as others have experience of,and as others have said elsewhere,he puts his spin on it and tries to make out we are all in the wrong :headbang:

What a Fanny!!

Stop stirring... if you don't have anything useful to add, pipe down.
 
post_id=1887959 said:
"The stark truth is that the vaccines do not provide reliable protection against infection, severe Covid or death."

Duckman, While its undeniable that the vaccine doesn't provide reliable protection against infection it absolutely does provide a big boost in terms of survivability to those most at risk (elderly/obese/underlying health issues). The very data that article mentions is a testament to that fact as while yes the majority of those in hospital with covid are vaccinated the numbers are substantially lower than they were last year before the vaccine for those risk groups and the death rate is also far lower.

Just compare the cases vs deaths in terms of the trends, the UK has had similar numbers of new cases to the "peak" in 2020 for multiple months (since about July) yet the deaths are a fraction (very roughly 1/10) of those in 2020
Cases: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases?areaType=overview&areaName=United Kingdom
Deaths: https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/deaths?areaType=overview&areaName=United Kingdom
 
Hey Jim,
Wullie ,and a few others, Constantly have a go at folk on here,are often Very insulting and abusive in their posts.
He piped up on another post of mine about b21 being on a power trip,and out and out had a pop at me
Yet,you haven't bothered telling him to pipe down once,from what I can see.
Or does flying fifer(Wullie) have free reign to spoil this forum with many hateful,and sht stirring posts??
 
craig3.2 said:
Hey Jim,
Wullie ,and a few others, Constantly have a go at folk on here,are often Very insulting and abusive in their posts.
He piped up on another post of mine about b21 being on a power trip,and out and out had a pop at me
Yet,you haven't bothered telling him to pipe down once,from what I can see.
Or does flying fifer(Wullie) have free reign to spoil this forum with many hateful,and sht stirring posts??

As far as I can see you were stirring the pot there too. Sick of people sticking their oar in and whining when someone bites back, it's like kindergarden.
 
craig3.2 said:
Hey Jim,
Wullie ,and a few others, Constantly have a go at folk on here,are often Very insulting and abusive in their posts.
He piped up on another post of mine about b21 being on a power trip,and out and out had a pop at me
Yet,you haven't bothered telling him to pipe down once,from what I can see.
Or does flying fifer(Wullie) have free reign to spoil this forum with many hateful,and sht stirring posts??

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
 
sp3ctre said:
Old-Duckman said:
You quote your lunatics, I’ll quote mine.

Your guy backed up exactly none of any of his points with any kind of science... If you want to post your conspiracy theories you are going to have to back them up somehow.
It is a fruitless endeavor to try to convince, or shall I say prove, one opinion or the other on such a divisive issue. You call my understanding and beliefs conspiracy I call yours ummm, I don’t know, perhaps faith in what you are being feed by the MSM and the powers that be.

You site science, though scientific results for any experiment should be repeatable by anyone endeavoring to perform the experiment on their own. Everyone who attempts to boil water at sea level will have it boil at 100 degrees C or 212 F. That is pure science, nothing of the sort has been repeatedly proven out by multiple scientists with respect to this so called pandemic. As far as I am aware no one has yet even isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus. You mention “statistics” yet I note that you mention none. The most that I would be willing to possibly give a nod of agreement to would perhaps be “observation”. There have been observations of a set of symptoms that have been labeled as Covid-19. Are you aware that the so called Delta variant has no test to distinguish between it and the initial strain of the virus, that is just one small example of what we are being lead to believe as fact but it is nothing but suggestion or worse yet propaganda. Science is found lacking when it comes to this whole mess. If that were not the case I would expect to see more agreement among the scientific community, including doctors from many disciplines, I’m not seeing that, are you? In fact I’m seeing quite the opposite.

I don’t hate anyone here for having a different opinion or understanding of the current situation that we all find ourselves in at this point in time. We all have strong opinions on the issues at hand, some state them more politely than others and at times I have found myself resorting to tactics and words that I could have relayed in a more thoughtful manner.

What I find most distasteful, and quite like school-yard behavior, are the all too common ad hominem attacks which are uncalled for, especially so in a group of those likeminded in some aspects (such as all being BMW enthusiasts). As always we as humans, though we disagree, we should not be disagreeable.
 
Old-Duckman said:
Are you aware that the so called Delta variant has no test to distinguish between it and the initial strain of the virus, that is just one small example of what we are being lead to believe as fact but it is nothing but suggestion or worse yet propaganda.

Thats not true either man, the basic bitch lateral flow (LFT) home tests cannot tell the difference but a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sent through for genetic sequencing can 100% differentiate between each variant. We do ourselves no favours by being factually inaccurate as well.
 
Flyingfifer said:
Old-Duckman said:
Are you aware that the so called Delta variant has no test to distinguish between it and the initial strain of the virus, that is just one small example of what we are being lead to believe as fact but it is nothing but suggestion or worse yet propaganda.


Thats not true either man, the basic bitch lateral flow (LFT) home tests cannot tell the difference but a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sent through for genetic sequencing can 100% differentiate between each variant. We do ourselves no favours by being factually inaccurate as well.
I stand corrected, thank you, my information is apparently outdated. I appreciate the response.
 
Old-Duckman said:
Flyingfifer said:
Old-Duckman said:
Are you aware that the so called Delta variant has no test to distinguish between it and the initial strain of the virus, that is just one small example of what we are being lead to believe as fact but it is nothing but suggestion or worse yet propaganda.


Thats not true either man, the basic bitch lateral flow (LFT) home tests cannot tell the difference but a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) sent through for genetic sequencing can 100% differentiate between each variant. We do ourselves no favours by being factually inaccurate as well.
I stand corrected, thank you, my information is apparently outdated. I appreciate the response.

You're very welcome, the information around the whole thing is a maelstrom of fact and fiction to say the least its basically impossible to keep track :thumbsup: :thumbsup:
 
sp3ctre said:
craig3.2 said:
Hey Jim,
Wullie ,and a few others, Constantly have a go at folk on here,are often Very insulting and abusive in their posts.
He piped up on another post of mine about b21 being on a power trip,and out and out had a pop at me
Yet,you haven't bothered telling him to pipe down once,from what I can see.
Or does flying fifer(Wullie) have free reign to spoil this forum with many hateful,and sht stirring posts??

As far as I can see you were stirring the pot there too. Sick of people sticking their oar in and whining when someone bites back, it's like kindergarden.
My point exactly,Jim
Flying fifer (and others) do this Constantly....
Just look at the other post quoting me,says it all
Yet,you have chosen to call me out on it,and not them?
Just saying there's no consistency there,if that's the case.
 
craig3.2 said:
sp3ctre said:
craig3.2 said:
Hey Jim,
Wullie ,and a few others, Constantly have a go at folk on here,are often Very insulting and abusive in their posts.
He piped up on another post of mine about b21 being on a power trip,and out and out had a pop at me
Yet,you haven't bothered telling him to pipe down once,from what I can see.
Or does flying fifer(Wullie) have free reign to spoil this forum with many hateful,and sht stirring posts??

As far as I can see you were stirring the pot there too. Sick of people sticking their oar in and whining when someone bites back, it's like kindergarden.
My point exactly,Jim
Flying fifer (and others) do this Constantly....
Just look at the other post quoting me,says it all
Yet,you have chosen to call me out on it,and not them?
Just saying there's no consistency there,if that's the case.

You know you could just PM him rather than being a pissy wee cow in public and embarrassing yourself but you do you sweetheart :thumbsup:
 
craig3.2 said:
sp3ctre said:
craig3.2 said:
Hey Jim,
Wullie ,and a few others, Constantly have a go at folk on here,are often Very insulting and abusive in their posts.
He piped up on another post of mine about b21 being on a power trip,and out and out had a pop at me
Yet,you haven't bothered telling him to pipe down once,from what I can see.
Or does flying fifer(Wullie) have free reign to spoil this forum with many hateful,and sht stirring posts??

As far as I can see you were stirring the pot there too. Sick of people sticking their oar in and whining when someone bites back, it's like kindergarden.
My point exactly,Jim
Flying fifer (and others) do this Constantly....
Just look at the other post quoting me,says it all
Yet,you have chosen to call me out on it,and not them?
Just saying there's no consistency there,if that's the case.

You posted right after me, so I commented onwhat I saw. I do not have the time to trawl through all the posts on here and moderate everyone individually. If you are saying you are being childish because other people are also being childish then I really have no words... I am losing the will to live with the current contencious topics at the moment.
 
sp3ctre said:
craig3.2 said:
sp3ctre said:
As far as I can see you were stirring the pot there too. Sick of people sticking their oar in and whining when someone bites back, it's like kindergarden.
My point exactly,Jim
Flying fifer (and others) do this Constantly....
Just look at the other post quoting me,says it all
Yet,you have chosen to call me out on it,and not them?
Just saying there's no consistency there,if that's the case.

You posted right after me, so I commented onwhat I saw. I do not have the time to trawl through all the posts on here and moderate everyone individually. If you are saying you are being childish because other people are also being childish then I really have no words... I am losing the will to live with the current contencious topics at the moment.

Not being childish Jim,just having right of reply.
Tbf,others have said Alot worse.

I too am getting sick of the topics on here,and with certain people who seem to want to continue,time and again, having a go at anyone who voices their opinions,if those opinions don't agree with theirs.

And then get away with posting abuse, hatred,etc etc and saying some pretty awful stuff, repeatedly, without any interference from the mods.
Hence why I haven't posted much recently,that and the fact that I have far more serious things to deal with of late.

So, I will just go back to not posting,let the idiots take over the asylum,as the saying goes. :roll:
 
Flyingfifer said:
craig3.2 said:
sp3ctre said:
As far as I can see you were stirring the pot there too. Sick of people sticking their oar in and whining when someone bites back, it's like kindergarden.
My point exactly,Jim
Flying fifer (and others) do this Constantly....
Just look at the other post quoting me,says it all
Yet,you have chosen to call me out on it,and not them?
Just saying there's no consistency there,if that's the case.

You know you could just PM him rather than being a pissy wee cow in public and embarrassing yourself but you do you sweetheart :thumbsup:

Well there's the pot calling the kettle black :rofl:
 
Flyingfifer said:
ronk said:
I am not being sucked into yet another of your disruptive “discussions”.

Then don't, I will ask you that one question and if you answer it that's the end of it, be brave Ron, prove me wrong, answer the question, show a bit of conviction rather than standing on your soap box and pontificating until you are asked a difficult question then you slink away.

Do you believe it is entirely acceptable, justified, above board and right to advocate the removal of medical care and by extension potentially causing the death of people because you disagree with their beliefs?
Just to cause a little confusion with the opposite scenario, does a doctor who is sworn to the hyppocractic oath, treat a Jehovah witness whose life depends on a blood transfusion which is against their beliefs. :poke:

Apologies to sp3ctre but couldn't help just a little stirring :D
 
Nanu said:
Flyingfifer said:
ronk said:
I am not being sucked into yet another of your disruptive “discussions”.

Then don't, I will ask you that one question and if you answer it that's the end of it, be brave Ron, prove me wrong, answer the question, show a bit of conviction rather than standing on your soap box and pontificating until you are asked a difficult question then you slink away.

Do you believe it is entirely acceptable, justified, above board and right to advocate the removal of medical care and by extension potentially causing the death of people because you disagree with their beliefs?
Just to cause a little confusion with the opposite scenario, does a doctor who is sworn to the hyppocractic oath, treat a Jehovah witness whose life depends on a blood transfusion which is against their beliefs. :poke:

Apologies to sp3ctre but couldn't help just a little stirring :D

No they don't it would be the same as a DNR (do not resuscitate) that person is entitled to refuse treatment. A doctor however cant (or shouldn't) refuse to treat that person because they are a JW
 
Back
Top Bottom