Omnicron...dont fear the reaper...
- Thread starter john-e89
- Start date
- Status
Spaldingski
...which is why I am staying well away from this thread, after I managed to irritate the G29 community so much with my sarky comments about the superfluous gadgets that remind them when to scratch their arse as well as opening windows automatically on detection of farts etc. :lol:mgrlane said:
But never one to miss out on an opportunity for stirring the pot I'll just leave this little gem here:
Dr. Peter McCullough Drops A Bombshell, Up To 187k People May Have Been Killed By Vaccines According To New Census Data
https://vidmax.com/video/209889-dr-...ines-according-to-new-census-data#allComments
:fingertap:
mgrlane said:This thread is amazing.
Since I last commented we have had someone threaten to offer someone out. Overly aggressive replies. Blind allegiance to Politicians, Drug Companies and Scientists who have lied consistency throughout the pandemic and food pic's spammed because (I am guessing) people don't agree with someone else's opinion.
Some of you buggers on here are 80 but going on 8 years old. Cheers guys- I have just had a right giggle.
A proper riot
If youre looking for more food pics have a look here Thread
Chris_D said:
Smartbear said:
There is so much information out there on both sides of the coin. People manipulate data to their own narrative. Sh1t, Pfizer (yes almighty Pfizer) has been doing it for years (largest pharmaceutical settlement in history for doing this).
On the flip side Dr McCullough's rants will also have a bias and will fit data for his cause.
In my opinion the answer is always in the middle between the two extremes. But in reply to the little "Anti-vaxxer" opinion piece from the Independent the figures for Omicron are below. It amazes me after 2 years people are still unable to muster any form of critical thinking.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1044481/Technical-Briefing-31-Dec-2021-Omicron_severity_update.pdf
Page 8
Attachments
mgrlane said:
Wait... you dare come here with some stats and sources to back up what you're saying!? Bloody Troll
Smartbear said:
That's not what that shows.
What that shows is that after booster number 3 for a certain period of time (2 weeks+) you have a very low likelihood of ending up in hospital. That is not however a permanent never ending state and as it states efficacy drops quickly.
There is also the age old problem of who is that based on, for example if that's based on a 18yo fit person that's bloody impressive but if it's based on a 70yo fat bloke then it's not.
Would be interested to get a view on how many jabs are too many? Totally anecdotal, but a lot of my friends/contacts who are double/triple vaccinated have said that's it, they 100% won't be getting another jab beyond what they have. I find this adjusted stance very peculiar.
Surely, if you felt strongly enough to get triple vaccinated within 6 months, why would you now stop? If you are actively pro-vaccination, then surely you would be ok with a twice-yearly vaccination to protect your health? If your opinion has changed, how many would you be ok with?
Why would you not be ok to get a top-up every 3 months for the next 5 years, if the government scientists recommend this? :? I've yet to talk with anyone who says they would 100% get a monthly vaccination if the government scientist recommend this....anyone on here who would do that if Chris Whitty recommended this?
Surely, if you felt strongly enough to get triple vaccinated within 6 months, why would you now stop? If you are actively pro-vaccination, then surely you would be ok with a twice-yearly vaccination to protect your health? If your opinion has changed, how many would you be ok with?
Why would you not be ok to get a top-up every 3 months for the next 5 years, if the government scientists recommend this? :? I've yet to talk with anyone who says they would 100% get a monthly vaccination if the government scientist recommend this....anyone on here who would do that if Chris Whitty recommended this?
Angelus666 said:
I don’t think it is the number of jabs that is the issue, more that the new variant seems to be less if a risk. When Covid first came about people were ending up on ventilators whereas now that is far less likely. I guess people are just weighing up the risks.
- Status