Every Olympics is named after the capital city - that's just 'tradition'. There are always events in other cities, but there has to be a focus if only for logistics sake. It's the largest public event in the world, bar none, and the number of people / events / associated activities and logistics is comparable to running 13 world cups at the same time over 2-3 weeks. Of course we could have the 'Thong (in Kent somewhere) Olympics', but it doesn't quite have the same ring to it...
The Games will bring lots of business to the UK, lots of (hopefully good) PR, and drive up interest in sport - tbh my doubt / concern is in the government being able to carry the 'legacy' beyond the games and make something worthwhile of it in the future, not least by re-using the infrastructure they have spent billions on.
The Games will bring lots of business to the UK, lots of (hopefully good) PR, and drive up interest in sport - tbh my doubt / concern is in the government being able to carry the 'legacy' beyond the games and make something worthwhile of it in the future, not least by re-using the infrastructure they have spent billions on.