bluestreak56 said:I dont think I came across correctly in the statement. E85s are not stark ugly on their own but in comparison to the coupe I believe they are.
As for the X4 its the best looking car out there right now![]()
Mike6 said:Must admit re my earlier comment that I havent looked at a coupe so spoke without knowledge. My view about any sports coupe is that you get the disadvantage of only having two seats but not the advantage of being able to enjoy roof down motoring.
However will make a point of having a good look at the coupe but is it any different from the roadster apart from having a hardtop.
Mike6 said:Must admit re my earlier comment that I havent looked at a coupe so spoke without knowledge. My view about any sports coupe is that you get the disadvantage of only having two seats but not the advantage of being able to enjoy roof down motoring.
However will make a point of having a good look at the coupe but is it any different from the roadster apart from having a hardtop.
bluestreak56 said:Mike6 said:Can never understand why anyone would insist on the coupe. I dont have any problem with them but for a car designed as a two seater top down car why have a permanent roof on it. If you dont want to put the roof down then just leave it up. A coupe must reflect poorly in resale value and limit your choice.
I couldnt disagree more. The E86 epitomises a good looking sleek lined coupe while the roadster is a stark ugly contrast in comparison. The roof completely destroys the look of the car top up or top down. This is of course just my personal taste & opinion but im sure a lot of coupe owners will agree with me.
For me the Coupe is something special but the roadster is just another car.. Sorry if this offends anyone this is not the intent of this post.
stevo///m3 said:Oof, nearly a can of worms this thread. The coupé's looks are a massive draw for many owners - it is for me. Not bothered which came first, the coupé does not have an unresolved design, for instance - it looks like it was in their plans from the start (even if it wasn't). Leave the OP choosing a coupé, he'll not go far wrong... Final thought is that the difference in price between some 3L and M coupés really is surprisingly small - but the maintenance will make the difference. Just my thoughts.
Stevo
srhutch said:What coupe owners need to remember is that their car wouldn't exist if it wasn't for the superior roadster.
Zeld4 said:The coupe was actually designed alongside the roadster as a special project but not given the go ahead for production until 2005. So it's far from being an afterthought. Here's the proof.
https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/south-africa/download.html?textId=158533&textAttachmentId=195534&forceStandardPage=true&missingMobilePage=true
Just for you TazTaz said:Zeld4 said:The coupe was actually designed alongside the roadster as a special project but not given the go ahead for production until 2005. So it's far from being an afterthought. Here's the proof.
https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/south-africa/download.html?textId=158533&textAttachmentId=195534&forceStandardPage=true&missingMobilePage=true
not read the document yet, but its dated July 2006, the roadster came out in 2003 (was it?)

Zeld4 said:Just for you TazTaz said:Zeld4 said:The coupe was actually designed alongside the roadster as a special project but not given the go ahead for production until 2005. So it's far from being an afterthought. Here's the proof.
https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/south-africa/download.html?textId=158533&textAttachmentId=195534&forceStandardPage=true&missingMobilePage=true
not read the document yet, but its dated July 2006, the roadster came out in 2003 (was it?)
![]()
Taz said:Zeld4 said:Taz said:awesome, that 1 to stick up the arses of the floppy top brigade lol