Definately will not be 25k... if it is... then it'll be one of the best selling 2 seater roadsters of 2015. gorgeous.
1066 Country
TitanTim said:I think people need to go to Specsavers, the Audi wouldn't have been a patch looks wise sitting alongside an E89, same with the current TT......bland
Tim.
There's lots on here that own both AUDI's & Beamers, so probably a degree of bias on some parts (like me)
Despite the E89 having some vivacious curves, I often look at them & think 'fat @rse'... & I like my posteriors pert & nicely trimmed, and, that R4's not too big & not too small.
SARS - found some more posts mentioning it has been going back & forth whether will be a production car, so still a reality
Jembo said:TitanTim said:I think people need to go to Specsavers, the Audi wouldn't have been a patch looks wise sitting alongside an E89, same with the current TT......bland
Tim.
There's lots on here that own both AUDI's & Beamers, so probably a degree of bias on some parts (like me)
Despite the E89 having some vivacious curves, I often look at them & think 'fat @rse'... & I like my posteriors pert & nicely trimmed, and, that R4's not too big & not too small.
SARS - found some more posts mentioning it has been going back & forth whether will be a production car, so still a reality
I've had a couple of New A3s but there is always that feeling you may as well just get a VW, but then maybe a Skoda, all fine cars to get you from A to B but not really that exciting to own. I looked at the TT same time as the E89 but for some funny reason preferred the original TT even though it never drove that well. The E89 like my Z3 I never tire looking at the things, can't really say that with any Audi at the moment.
Tim.
A
Anonymous
Guest
looks a bit like the 2015 R8? (ignoring the side vent)
it wont go into production but even if it did, i dont like it
im considering what i will be changing to next year and still cant find a more stunning car than the z4 m sport..... although the performance of the tt rs or cheaper tts could sway me, looks wise, there is nothing out there for the same price that i would buy instead of the z4
im considering what i will be changing to next year and still cant find a more stunning car than the z4 m sport..... although the performance of the tt rs or cheaper tts could sway me, looks wise, there is nothing out there for the same price that i would buy instead of the z4
A
Anonymous
Guest
In this months Auto Express the Audi R4 is due out in 2015 I only bought the mag because the 2015 R8 and the 2015 Mac P13 is in it 
I only bought the mag because the 2015 R8 and the 2015 Mac P13 is in it 
Having sold only 15k E89's worldwide last year (less than 1% of their total volume) I don't think BMW will be overly bothered about dipping their toes in another roadster sub-segment somehow.
lux good said:
Firstly it's my opinion so I'm not talking out of my arse.
If I said, the E89 is actually a modified Datsun 240Z, that would be talking out of my arse.
As for my comments, I think the rear end looks un-sculpted and bulbous. Like gym monkeys who ingest too much protein, I think it lacks the 'definition' and sharp lines of the E85/86.
The front half of the car looks great, but the rear ruins it for me.
Whilst I do like the E89 design quite a lot, I agree with Steven that the rear is the least resolved part of the car. You couldn't call the rear attractive.