Truth said:I don’t know him but the locking of the thread will NOT stop people seeing the evidence in the thread in the future and will warn off future customers.
However locking the thread WILL stop these continuous and repetitive complaints. The forum doesn’t need it and if a future customer has read it once they won’t need to read it again and again. He’s done wrong. We can all see that. Let’s lock it now.
I'm not sure why this thread gets under your skin so much for someone that claims they don't even know DLV, its very strange!Truth said:I agree with Tomk lock it/delete it.
Mack if it does dissapear then no one will know he has a service, on here! But senseless to keep on bleating on about it now and repeating the facts for your own gratification against DLV.
He is still doing business as Monster on the “what have you done to your car” thread went there recently. I’m not going to keep on repeating and adding to this toxic thread. My thoughts have been made clear. All the best
MACK said:I'm not sure why this thread gets under your skin so much for someone that claims they don't even know DLV, its very strange!Truth said:I agree with Tomk lock it/delete it.
Mack if it does dissapear then no one will know he has a service, on here! But senseless to keep on bleating on about it now and repeating the facts for your own gratification against DLV.
He is still doing business as Monster on the “what have you done to your car” thread went there recently. I’m not going to keep on repeating and adding to this toxic thread. My thoughts have been made clear. All the best
Its obvious that the thread remaining provides a bit of balance for anyone seeing his name mentioned in other threads and thinking of using him. They can look at this and see how he's treated some members and make a judgement call based on a more rounded picture of the guy. Why would you want to stifle that?
It speak volumes that instead of supporting members he's shafted you rather come on here, be insulting and sanctimonious about it then look to silence them.
Truth said:MACK said:I'm not sure why this thread gets under your skin so much for someone that claims they don't even know DLV, its very strange!Truth said:I agree with Tomk lock it/delete it.
Mack if it does dissapear then no one will know he has a service, on here! But senseless to keep on bleating on about it now and repeating the facts for your own gratification against DLV.
He is still doing business as Monster on the “what have you done to your car” thread went there recently. I’m not going to keep on repeating and adding to this toxic thread. My thoughts have been made clear. All the best
Its obvious that the thread remaining provides a bit of balance for anyone seeing his name mentioned in other threads and thinking of using him. They can look at this and see how he's treated some members and make a judgement call based on a more rounded picture of the guy. Why would you want to stifle that?
It speak volumes that instead of supporting members he's shafted you rather come on here, be insulting and sanctimonious about it then look to silence them.
I see your point and don’t get me wrong I don’t want to support a guy doing people wrong. That’s not me and I hope the wronged parties get it all sorted and they do have my sympathies.
TomK said:It's a total joke isn't it. DLV... stand up... be a man. All this over a backbox. Unbelievable.
@Rocket, if it helps I'm more than happy to stand you for the money owed, I'd hope though that through scc you should retrieve it from this cowboy but if time is of any issue let me know. If he shafts you then honestly no worries, I've learnt enough over the years off this forum to have saved me that money.
My first thought was that this thread should be deleted not locked (so as not to advertise his 'sevices'), but the discussion above merits thought about the best way to warn people about certain businesses. I know it can put a forum into tricky situations when it comes to libellous content, but to (my non lawyer brain) I don't see an issue here, they would, at the very minimum, have to prove factual incorrectness.
Ivanobonetti said:Just reading this thread with interest
Another who wasn't happy with Mike. In fact, reading the post by MACK , I feel even more hard done by - I wish I'd had as good a service as you :lol:
I thought I was the only one to have had bad experience so kept it to myself, but to help others out who may be thinking of using him, I'd try very hard to find somebody else.
Rocket said:No, not heard a thing. My final letter before court action goes out tommorow.
Not yet. I gave him a deadline that has now expired by a few days. So I now need to start the whole court thing, which i will do in the coming days when I have time and I am in the mood. Maybe tomorrow as I may be snowbound.ronk said:Rocket said:No, not heard a thing. My final letter before court action goes out tommorow.
Did the court proceedings go ahead?
Rocket said:As this thread has hit the top again. Just an update. The court issued a judgement for the claimant (me). I have received no money yet.