cj10jeeper said:
They are cheap because of a combination of factors from the economy, concerns over fuel prices, the high tax bracket for the ///M, high service costs and high insurance. Some of it more perceived than actual. I also wonder if right now they are stuck between being old 'new' cars and not yet gradulated to classic status.
Absolutely. Almost £500 a year in tax before you've done anything is very hard to stomach, and something you have no control over if they decided to start charging £600, or £700.
Fuel prices and the fuel economy combined makes for a huge expense, meaning cost-wise it's far more sensible to opt for the 3.0si if you're doing any sort of mileage. Then, if you do low mileage, you feel the £500 a year in tax is horrendous. It goes in circles.
High insurance and service costs are certainly a factor, but less so than the others. mmm-five has provided a useful website on several occasions which helps drive the servicing costs down, and the majority of us are old enough now that insurance is low enough for the difference to be much smaller.
Personally Woody, I would revise the advert you have, and adjust what you're saying on here. You've said you had a few offers of £13k, yet it's now for sale at £13k and hasn't sold. The pictures aren't helping the sale of the car either, and personally would stick to facts rather than lengthy opinion and detail. When I look for a car, I'd like to see (in order):
- Mileage
- MOT Date
- Tax Date
- Exterior Colour (with the proper name)
- Interior Colour (with the proper name)
- Standard Equipment (for those not so au fait with the car)
- Optional Equipment
- FULL Service History
- Location (First part of your postcode)
- Any recent routine work you've had undertaken (tyres, brakes, etc - big items that people commonly look for)