Stark said:Q. How fast can a car go in a reverse gear? Say for example, an auto.
IMO, if the hill was steep enough that the free-wheeling velocity, after allowing for the engine breaking effect, over-revved the engine in 1st gear then, yes, you could do some serious damagePlumbNB1 said:Heres mine
When rolling down a steep hill - even with the engine (fuel deliver) limiter cutting in - would a manual car in 1st gear destroy the engine or would the engine braking effectively prevent this?
PerryGunn said:IMO, if the hill was steep enough that the free-wheeling velocity, after allowing for the engine breaking effect, over-revved the engine in 1st gear then, yes, you could do some serious damagePlumbNB1 said:Heres mine
When rolling down a steep hill - even with the engine (fuel deliver) limiter cutting in - would a manual car in 1st gear destroy the engine or would the engine braking effectively prevent this?
PerryGunn said:
A. Because that's what the law says in this country.Stark said:Q. Why is undertaking an offence in this country but not in others....is it justifiably as offence?
And whoever`s idea it was either doesn't drive or just likes increasing congestion as it works so well every where else yet we have to make things more difficult for some reason.mmm-five said:A. Because that's what the law says in this country.Stark said:Q. Why is undertaking an offence in this country but not in others....is it justifiably as offence?
Boring, yawn, sorry :| sensible question I suppose :roll:Stark said:Q. Not all of us need tyres changing all at once, ie all 4. But when some want to change from run flats to non run flats, what would be the problem with say two run flats to the front two normal tyres to the rear?
Stark said:Q. Why is undertaking an offence in this country but not in others....is it justifiably as offence?
Which, for you lazy barstewards saysDav the wheel nut said:Check out paragraph 268