Bing said:I'm not sure it's a great investment at that price unless you buy it and simply don't drive it for 15 years... Though it's in mint condition.
Angelus666 said:http://www.autotrader.co.uk/used-cars/bmw/z4m/used-bmw-z4m-3-2-m-coupe-2dr-fulham-fpa-201502191077750?logcode=p
Wow....3500 miles...think this is a great buy for anyone considering an investment. Must be the lowest out there?
Taz said:Angelus666 said:http://www.autotrader.co.uk/used-cars/bmw/z4m/used-bmw-z4m-3-2-m-coupe-2dr-fulham-fpa-201502191077750?logcode=p
Wow....3500 miles...think this is a great buy for anyone considering an investment. Must be the lowest out there?
this is LF78960
Bing said:I honestly think fuel economy and prices are irrelevant to most people who buy these cars - lower prices are welcome, but when I bought mine I didn't even really think about the higher cost of fuel, I just bought it. And I will be doing up to 15k a year in mine. Bemoaning the cost of fuel or low mpg is missing the point. I don't think lower fuel prices will last, and I don't think lower prices are tempting people into thirstier cars - though I haven't done any statistically relevant research![]()
Joker - I hope! *Edit- don't answer that - found relevant forum post*Adamski said:Saw it at Fort Kinnaird in Edinburgh. But as he was too busy revving the nuts off it and spinning the tyres up near a pedestrian crossing I couldn't quite make out the colour of the rear discs :roll:
LostBoy_84 said:Was this wataz4m's car? A fraudulent advert or a typo on the price?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifi...coupe/bmw-3-2-z4m-coupe-fantastic-car/3746992
If it was genuinely a private seller, why would you have photos with a clear company/trade brand logo at the bottom right :?Havard said:LostBoy_84 said:Was this wataz4m's car? A fraudulent advert or a typo on the price?
http://www.pistonheads.com/classifi...coupe/bmw-3-2-z4m-coupe-fantastic-car/3746992
Looks and sounds like a scam. Was going to ring up for a laugh.
ZermattV said:But 3 year old Boxter S are more like 38 to 40k meaning a 20k cost to change . Tend to agree that the 981 Boxter S is a logical update from an M .
Small two seater German sportscar that the old Z4 used to compete with (and was better than).Z4M-2006 said:ZermattV said:But 3 year old Boxter S are more like 38 to 40k meaning a 20k cost to change . Tend to agree that the 981 Boxter S is a logical update from an M .
In what way ?
Darren M said:Small two seater German sportscar that the old Z4 used to compete with (and was better than).Z4M-2006 said:ZermattV said:But 3 year old Boxter S are more like 38 to 40k meaning a 20k cost to change . Tend to agree that the 981 Boxter S is a logical update from an M .
In what way ?
Comparing new Cayman to Z4 M Coupe:
£48k basic spec S model gets you the following where Z4 M was what £40k new?
325bhp
Nearly 9 years newer(based on earliest M's),
0 miles
0 owners,
40% aluminium body
33% stiffer body
best part of 10mpg better fuel economy (not far off 45% better)
best part of 180kg lighter (crucial IMO - the old Z4 M was a bit heavy)
probably half the annual road tax
safer in case of a crash (probably!)
5000 to 7000 more miles between services (service intervals are at 20k miles in later Boxster/Cayman)
Fabulous sound (expecially with sports exhaust)
Not that I've been doing any research or anything. It is the modern Z4 M and there's even an Si equivelant.
As future used cars, if the Z4 M holds it's value these will look attractive as they get cheaper
FloatingDream said:so is the market price going down over time? could be winter blues?
RickRob said:If this is true and the trend continues then the Forum is going to have to review its rule about not selling for more than you paid??