nick_z4 said:Thats something i'm looking at too
Why not look at higher milage cars? Low miles is not necessarily a good indicator and regardless of miles covered the early cars are now 9 years old.Older cars are better bought on overall condition and history.
If someone drove a Z4 M around London for 9 years, constantly in stop-go traffic, doing multiple cold starts a day a day it might still show as low milage but probably would have more wear than a car with over double the miles that has done a lot of fast road driving (motorway, b roads etc)
my previous M covered 77 k miles mostly in my hands but led such an easy life - but only I know that
. Next buyer would have thought "77k miles, a bit high" but has been fortunate enough to buy a fantastic car. The rear pads were still original and the fronts pads were only replaced shortly before selling it due to a problem with a caliper sticking causing damage to a disk
