Loud tappet like noises from Engine....

and now the bill grows bigger because of extra work, these specialist imo do as much guess work as a forum does.
 
T1berious said:
Well, to the guys who said it wasn't bottom end...

You were right!

Big ends replaced and noise remains. Engine now going to be removed and stripped.

Ouch!

Heard very little in the way of useful diagnostic info from this garage so far. Before they remove the engine, you need to hear, explicitly:

- Bottom end bearings inspected - shells worn but not spun. Bottom end crank, rods etc undamaged. Shells replaced
(at this point you are still OK, economically, as bearing shell proactive maintenance is a good move and you have an invoice plus bill of materials that looks sensible)
- Top end inspected. Valve clearances within tolerance and/or adjusted back into spec. No damage to valve train, springs or seats, or excessive wear of cam followers or lobes

Even after all that you'd still want them take another look at ancillaries, Vanos etc before yanking out the engine.

Don't let them spend your money based on a hunch. That's our job. :D
 
Ducklakeview said:
Definitely valvetrain related, sounds like just the one cam/follower knocking. I'd not be running that until it's been apart for inspection. At this point the cam/follower "may" be salvageable. Keep running it, and it won't..

Mike

Erm...

Sorry but I called top end on day one!

I really don't know how these "specialists" can call themselves so, if they can't get basic diagnosis right..

I feel for you OP..

And WTF do they want to pull the motor for?

Mike
 
Op....

Did they actually show you any of the shell bearings,or that there was anything actually wrong with the bottom end..?

Whats the situation with the misdiagnosis,do you have to pay ?

When you posted the video,it sounded just like cam follower wear to me as i said early on,but its so hard to diagnose a noise on the net.


Again its all speculation, but when building an S54 there are certain criteria that must be checked and checked again. Tolerances are fine and if build processes are not adhered to then you get problems down the line.

So........... Its either top end,which will be very easy to see,and if they have done the valve clearances as instructed then they should have seen it..

Or........ The crank is oval and they havent measured to check

Or......They havent used Plastique to size the bearings and fitted the wrong size

Or...... Used a damaged rod in the build,and its immediately damaged the bearing shell.


Good luck with it,i feel for you..

You aint the first or the last thats encountered these problems with the S54....
 
Z4M-2006 said:
..

Or........ The crank is oval and they havent measured to check

Or......They havent used Plastique to size the bearings and fitted the wrong size

Or...... Used a damaged rod in the build,and its immediately damaged the bearing shell.

As above, these are not only common sense when building ANY engine, they are "basic skills" in the field,

As such, if I was the OP I would be taking it elsewhere..

Mike
 
T1berious said:
Well, to the guys who said it wasn't bottom end...

You were right!

Big ends replaced and noise remains. Engine now going to be removed and stripped.

Ouch!

OMFG!!! The overwhelming view from your vid was top end. And the bottom end has been worked on and the noise is still there. I am pretty speechless. You must get evidence that the bottom end had failed, something otherwise are you being taken for a ride by someone guessing?
Is this where there was wear to the bearing shells, as they usually is, and they put the diagnosis on that?

TBH when I first had my engine diagnosed I spent the 1 hour labour charge at a MAIN F****ING DEALER who told me I just needed the clearances done, and never spotted the cams and followers were in a state and ticking. These issues seem to sometimes be missed, but this situation seems either a tragic mess or something else going on.
 
T1berious said:
Well, to the guys who said it wasn't bottom end...

You were right!

Big ends replaced and noise remains. Engine now going to be removed and stripped.

Ouch!

That’s ridiculous. I’d recover the car to a capable ///M specialist.

I think you should open negotiations with your current garage by refusing to pay since they’ve not fixed the problem. Ultimately, paying 50% of the cost to change the bearing shells would be reasonable as it’s preventative maintenance anyway.

Give Phil a call if you’re not too far away:

BMWZ4MC said:
I'm in the followers / cams camp. The good news is that the primary failure seems to be the case hardening on the followers, so catching it early and not driving further avoids damage to the cams. If that is the cause, Schrick sell OEM followers to which they apply an additional hardening process. They aren't terribly expensive although I would replace them all. If you need news cams, they are pretty costly and the labour required increases significantly due to the limited access in the Z4M (cf the E46 M3). The job can be done without dismantling the entire front of the car but only by someone who knows what they're doing.
Where are you based? Phil at CPC in Amersham has done this job on several forum cars and many M3s.
 
I think I'm going to call him and ask if he's inspected the valve train.

The whole misdiagnosis thing is a concern but I'm kind of in the preventative maintenance is a good thing boat. Also when the car goes wrong I normally just take it BMW and assume the position. However this time I felt that the saving would be worth it as it was looking like 700-1000.

Now, I'm no so sure....

I'm at the point where I just want it fixed.

Anyone you guys recommend in the Midlands area who can inspect it post repair?

Cheers

T1b
 
Doesn't sound internal to me, more like something like a Mani bolt worked it's way loose or a pulley knocking. Does not sound like death rattle at all not metallic enough.
 
+1 for CPC in Amersham, appreciate might not be anywhere nearby but they did the full works on my car solving follower finger wear (and were capable of identifying it very easily).

I'd aim to find someone who has history of investigating this issue in order to confirm/rule it out.

JB
 
I'm kind of in the boat I'm in and am adopting the "preventative maintenance" approach to the work being done. Turns out there was a bit of metal in cylinder 4 (how it wasn't destroyed and flushed out the exhaust I have no idea).

But engine in pieces

24109468378_13ebe34fdc_z.jpg


37929609452_249ee3fc4f_z.jpg


Hopefully will be back soon, fighting fit and ready for a Dyno session
 
Where did the metal come from?

I've had similar on one of my other cars caused by a fragment of the plug tip ceramic (actually it was caused by a moronic main dealer tech damaging the old plug on removal, but that's off topic) anyway like yours that one wasn't expelled messing-up the piston and scoring the bore :cry:
 
Back
Top Bottom